special diagnostic for ARC ownership-qualified types. We wouldn't want
to expose Objective-C programmers to the term "POD", would we? Fixes
<rdar://problem/
9772982>.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@136558
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
def warn_second_parameter_to_va_arg_not_pod : Warning<
"second argument to 'va_arg' is of non-POD type %0">,
InGroup<DiagGroup<"non-pod-varargs">>, DefaultError;
+def warn_second_parameter_to_va_arg_ownership_qualified : Warning<
+ "second argument to 'va_arg' is of ARC ownership-qualified type %0">,
+ InGroup<DiagGroup<"non-pod-varargs">>, DefaultError;
def warn_second_parameter_to_va_arg_never_compatible : Warning<
"second argument to 'va_arg' is of promotable type %0; this va_arg has "
"undefined behavior because arguments will be promoted to %1">;
<< TInfo->getTypeLoc().getSourceRange()))
return ExprError();
- if (!TInfo->getType().isPODType(Context))
+ if (!TInfo->getType().isPODType(Context)) {
Diag(TInfo->getTypeLoc().getBeginLoc(),
- diag::warn_second_parameter_to_va_arg_not_pod)
+ TInfo->getType()->isObjCLifetimeType()
+ ? diag::warn_second_parameter_to_va_arg_ownership_qualified
+ : diag::warn_second_parameter_to_va_arg_not_pod)
<< TInfo->getType()
<< TInfo->getTypeLoc().getSourceRange();
+ }
// Check for va_arg where arguments of the given type will be promoted
// (i.e. this va_arg is guaranteed to have undefined behavior).
// expected-note{{explicitly cast the pointer to silence this warning}}
memmove(ptr, uip, 17);
}
+
+void rdar9772982(int i, ...) {
+ __builtin_va_list ap;
+
+ __builtin_va_start(ap, i);
+ __builtin_va_arg(ap, __strong id); // expected-error{{second argument to 'va_arg' is of ARC ownership-qualified type '__strong id'}}
+ __builtin_va_end(ap);
+}