* UNION with LIMIT fails
* Unique index on base column not honored on inserts from inherited table
INSERT INTO inherit_table (unique_index_col) VALUES (dup) should fail
+ (see TODO.detail/inherit)
* CREATE TABLE x AS SELECT 1 UNION SELECT 2 fails
* CREATE TABLE test(col char(2) DEFAULT user) fails in length restriction
* mismatched types in CREATE TABLE ... DEFAULT causes problems
* Add non-large-object binary field
* Add index on NUMERIC/DECIMAL type
* Make Absolutetime/Relativetime int4 because time_t can be int8 on some ports
+* Functions returning sets don't really work right(see TODO.detail/functions)
VIEWS
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id QAA02173
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 14 May 1999 16:00:44 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (hub.org [209.167.229.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id QAA02824 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 14 May 1999 16:00:45 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (hub.org [209.167.229.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id QAA02824 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 14 May 1999 16:00:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hub.org (hub.org [209.167.229.1])
by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA47798;
Fri, 14 May 1999 15:57:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id TAA16399
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 25 Nov 1998 19:01:01 -0500 (EST)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id SAA05250 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 25 Nov 1998 18:53:12 -0500 (EST)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id SAA05250 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 25 Nov 1998 18:53:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id SAA17798;
Wed, 25 Nov 1998 18:49:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id DAA20206
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 29 Aug 1999 03:58:29 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.2 $) with ESMTP id DAA00347 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 29 Aug 1999 03:44:32 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id DAA00347 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 29 Aug 1999 03:44:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hub.org (hub.org [216.126.84.1])
by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA91360;
Sun, 29 Aug 1999 03:35:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA14231
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 06:31:12 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from gandalf.telecom.at (gandalf.telecom.at [194.118.26.84]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id GAA21099 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 06:23:41 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from gandalf.telecom.at (gandalf.telecom.at [194.118.26.84]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id GAA21099 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 06:23:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from zeugswettera.user.lan.at (zeugswettera.user.lan.at [10.4.123.227]) by gandalf.telecom.at (A.B.C.Delta4/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA38132; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 12:22:07 +0200
Received: by zeugswettera.user.lan.at with Microsoft Mail
id <01BDD4DA.C7F5B690@zeugswettera.user.lan.at>; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 12:27:55 +0200
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id DAA06237
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 8 Sep 1998 03:39:36 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from bgalli.mug.org (bajor.mug.org [207.158.132.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id DAA03648 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 8 Sep 1998 03:38:52 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from bgalli.mug.org (bajor.mug.org [207.158.132.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id DAA03648 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 8 Sep 1998 03:38:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (bga@localhost) by bgalli.mug.org (8.8.7/SCO5) with SMTP id DAA02895 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 8 Sep 1998 03:31:26 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199809080731.DAA02895@bgalli.mug.org>
X-Authentication-Warning: bgalli.mug.org: bga@localhost didn't use HELO protocol
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id OAA12443
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 1 Oct 1998 14:00:56 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id NAA07930 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 1 Oct 1998 13:57:47 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id NAA07930 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 1 Oct 1998 13:57:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA26913;
Thu, 1 Oct 1998 13:56:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id TAA23341
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 2 Oct 1998 19:28:08 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id SAA18003 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 2 Oct 1998 18:21:37 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id SAA18003 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 2 Oct 1998 18:21:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA01250;
Fri, 2 Oct 1998 18:08:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id XAA06644
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sat, 3 Oct 1998 23:31:13 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id XAA26912 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sat, 3 Oct 1998 23:14:01 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id XAA26912 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sat, 3 Oct 1998 23:14:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA04407;
Sat, 3 Oct 1998 22:07:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id WAA05961
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sat, 3 Oct 1998 22:42:18 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from mail.utexas.edu (wb2-a.mail.utexas.edu [128.83.126.136]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with SMTP id WAA25111 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sat, 3 Oct 1998 22:27:34 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from mail.utexas.edu (wb2-a.mail.utexas.edu [128.83.126.136]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with SMTP id WAA25111 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sat, 3 Oct 1998 22:27:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 25622 invoked by uid 0); 4 Oct 1998 02:26:21 -0000
Received: from dial-42-9.ots.utexas.edu (HELO taral) (128.83.111.217)
by umbs-smtp-2 with SMTP; 4 Oct 1998 02:26:21 -0000
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id NAA00997
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 13:31:00 -0500 (EST)
-Received: from u1.abs.net (root@u1.abs.net [207.114.0.131]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id NAA26657 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 13:10:14 -0500 (EST)
+Received: from u1.abs.net (root@u1.abs.net [207.114.0.131]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id NAA26657 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 13:10:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from insightdist.com (nobody@localhost)
by u1.abs.net (8.9.0/8.9.0) with UUCP id MAA17710
for maillist@candle.pha.pa.us; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 12:52:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA13785
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 30 Aug 1998 13:01:09 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id MAA29386 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 30 Aug 1998 12:58:24 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id MAA29386 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 30 Aug 1998 12:58:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost) by hub.org (8.8.8/8.7.5) with SMTP id MAA11406; Sun, 30 Aug 1998 12:54:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by hub.org (TLB v0.10a (1.23 tibbs 1997/01/09 00:29:32)); Sun, 30 Aug 1998 12:52:22 +0000 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.org (8.8.8/8.7.5) id MAA11310 for pgsql-hackers-outgoing; Sun, 30 Aug 1998 12:52:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA21195
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 11:31:13 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id LAA06827 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 11:17:41 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id LAA06827 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 11:17:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost) by hub.org (8.8.8/8.7.5) with SMTP id LAA24792; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 11:12:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by hub.org (TLB v0.10a (1.23 tibbs 1997/01/09 00:29:32)); Mon, 31 Aug 1998 11:10:31 +0000 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.org (8.8.8/8.7.5) id LAA24742 for pgsql-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 11:10:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id GAA05554
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 18 Dec 1998 06:31:21 -0500 (EST)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.145.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id EAA21127 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 18 Dec 1998 04:46:38 -0500 (EST)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.145.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id EAA21127 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 18 Dec 1998 04:46:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id EAA01409;
Fri, 18 Dec 1998 04:44:19 -0500 (EST)
regards, tom lane
+From owner-pgsql-hackers@hub.org Wed Sep 22 20:31:02 1999
+Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
+ by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id UAA15611
+ for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 22 Sep 1999 20:31:01 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.2 $) with ESMTP id UAA02926 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 22 Sep 1999 20:21:24 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (hub.org [216.126.84.1])
+ by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA75413;
+ Wed, 22 Sep 1999 20:09:35 -0400 (EDT)
+ (envelope-from owner-pgsql-hackers@hub.org)
+Received: by hub.org (TLB v0.10a (1.23 tibbs 1997/01/09 00:29:32)); Wed, 22 Sep 1999 20:08:50 +0000 (EDT)
+Received: (from majordom@localhost)
+ by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA75058
+ for pgsql-hackers-outgoing; Wed, 22 Sep 1999 20:06:58 -0400 (EDT)
+ (envelope-from owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org)
+Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2])
+ by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA74982
+ for <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>; Wed, 22 Sep 1999 20:06:25 -0400 (EDT)
+ (envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
+Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+ by sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA06411
+ for <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>; Wed, 22 Sep 1999 20:05:40 -0400 (EDT)
+To: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
+Subject: [HACKERS] Progress report: buffer refcount bugs and SQL functions
+Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 20:05:39 -0400
+Message-ID: <6408.938045139@sss.pgh.pa.us>
+From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
+Sender: owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
+Precedence: bulk
+Status: RO
+
+I have been finding a lot of interesting stuff while looking into
+the buffer reference count/leakage issue.
+
+It turns out that there were two specific things that were camouflaging
+the existence of bugs in this area:
+
+1. The BufferLeakCheck routine that's run at transaction commit was
+only looking for nonzero PrivateRefCount to indicate a missing unpin.
+It failed to notice nonzero LastRefCount --- which meant that an
+error in refcount save/restore usage could leave a buffer pinned,
+and BufferLeakCheck wouldn't notice.
+
+2. The BufferIsValid macro, which you'd think just checks whether
+it's handed a valid buffer identifier or not, actually did more:
+it only returned true if the buffer ID was valid *and* the buffer
+had positive PrivateRefCount. That meant that the common pattern
+ if (BufferIsValid(buf))
+ ReleaseBuffer(buf);
+wouldn't complain if it were handed a valid but already unpinned buffer.
+And that behavior masks bugs that result in buffers being unpinned too
+early. For example, consider a sequence like
+
+1. LockBuffer (buffer now has refcount 1). Store reference to
+ a tuple on that buffer page in a tuple table slot.
+2. Copy buffer reference to a second tuple-table slot, but forget to
+ increment buffer's refcount.
+3. Release second tuple table slot. Buffer refcount drops to 0,
+ so it's unpinned.
+4. Release original tuple slot. Because of BufferIsValid behavior,
+ no assert happens here; in fact nothing at all happens.
+
+This is, of course, buggy code: during the interval from 3 to 4 you
+still have an apparently valid tuple reference in the original slot,
+which someone might try to use; but the buffer it points to is unpinned
+and could be replaced at any time by another backend.
+
+In short, we had errors that would mask both missing-pin bugs and
+missing-unpin bugs. And naturally there were a few such bugs lurking
+behind them...
+
+3. The buffer refcount save/restore stuff, which I had suspected
+was useless, is not only useless but also buggy. The reason it's
+buggy is that it only works if used in a nested fashion. You could
+save state A, pin some buffers, save state B, pin some more
+buffers, restore state B (thereby unpinning what you pinned since
+the save), and finally restore state A (unpinning the earlier stuff).
+What you could not do is save state A, pin, save B, pin more, then
+restore state A --- that might unpin some of A's buffers, or some
+of B's buffers, or some unforeseen combination thereof. If you
+restore A and then restore B, you do not necessarily return to a zero-
+pins state, either. And it turns out the actual usage pattern was a
+nearly random sequence of saves and restores, compounded by a failure to
+do all of the restores reliably (which was masked by the oversight in
+BufferLeakCheck).
+
+
+What I have done so far is to rip out the buffer refcount save/restore
+support (including LastRefCount), change BufferIsValid to a simple
+validity check (so that you get an assert if you unpin something that
+was pinned), change ExecStoreTuple so that it increments the refcount
+when it is handed a buffer reference (for symmetry with ExecClearTuple's
+decrement of the refcount), and fix about a dozen bugs exposed by these
+changes.
+
+I am still getting Buffer Leak notices in the "misc" regression test,
+specifically in the queries that invoke more than one SQL function.
+What I find there is that SQL functions are not always run to
+completion. Apparently, when a function can return multiple tuples,
+it won't necessarily be asked to produce them all. And when it isn't,
+postquel_end() isn't invoked for the function's current query, so its
+tuple table isn't cleared, so we have dangling refcounts if any of the
+tuples involved are in disk buffers.
+
+It may be that the save/restore code was a misguided attempt to fix
+this problem. I can't tell. But I think what we really need to do is
+find some way of ensuring that Postquel function execution contexts
+always get shut down by the end of the query, so that they don't leak
+resources.
+
+I suppose a straightforward approach would be to keep a list of open
+function contexts somewhere (attached to the outer execution context,
+perhaps), and clean them up at outer-plan shutdown.
+
+What I am wondering, though, is whether this addition is actually
+necessary, or is it a bug that the functions aren't run to completion
+in the first place? I don't really understand the semantics of this
+"nested dot notation". I suppose it is a Berkeleyism; I can't find
+anything about it in the SQL92 document. The test cases shown in the
+misc regress test seem peculiar, not to say wrong. For example:
+
+regression=> SELECT p.hobbies.equipment.name, p.hobbies.name, p.name FROM person p;
+name |name |name
+-------------+-----------+-----
+advil |posthacking|mike
+peet's coffee|basketball |joe
+hightops |basketball |sally
+(3 rows)
+
+which doesn't appear to agree with the contents of the underlying
+relations:
+
+regression=> SELECT * FROM hobbies_r;
+name |person
+-----------+------
+posthacking|mike
+posthacking|jeff
+basketball |joe
+basketball |sally
+skywalking |
+(5 rows)
+
+regression=> SELECT * FROM equipment_r;
+name |hobby
+-------------+-----------
+advil |posthacking
+peet's coffee|posthacking
+hightops |basketball
+guts |skywalking
+(4 rows)
+
+I'd have expected an output along the lines of
+
+advil |posthacking|mike
+peet's coffee|posthacking|mike
+hightops |basketball |joe
+hightops |basketball |sally
+
+Is the regression test's expected output wrong, or am I misunderstanding
+what this query is supposed to do? Is there any documentation anywhere
+about how SQL functions returning multiple tuples are supposed to
+behave?
+
+ regards, tom lane
+
+************
+
+
+From owner-pgsql-hackers@hub.org Thu Sep 23 11:03:19 1999
+Received: from hub.org (hub.org [216.126.84.1])
+ by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id LAA16211
+ for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 11:03:17 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (hub.org [216.126.84.1])
+ by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA58151;
+ Thu, 23 Sep 1999 10:53:46 -0400 (EDT)
+ (envelope-from owner-pgsql-hackers@hub.org)
+Received: by hub.org (TLB v0.10a (1.23 tibbs 1997/01/09 00:29:32)); Thu, 23 Sep 1999 10:53:05 +0000 (EDT)
+Received: (from majordom@localhost)
+ by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA57948
+ for pgsql-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 10:52:23 -0400 (EDT)
+ (envelope-from owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org)
+Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2])
+ by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA57841
+ for <hackers@postgreSQL.org>; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 10:51:50 -0400 (EDT)
+ (envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
+Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+ by sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA14211;
+ Thu, 23 Sep 1999 10:51:10 -0400 (EDT)
+To: Andreas Zeugswetter <andreas.zeugswetter@telecom.at>
+cc: hackers@postgreSQL.org
+Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Progress report: buffer refcount bugs and SQL functions
+In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 23 Sep 1999 10:07:24 +0200
+ <37E9DFBC.5C0978F@telecom.at>
+Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 10:51:10 -0400
+Message-ID: <14209.938098270@sss.pgh.pa.us>
+From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
+Sender: owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
+Precedence: bulk
+Status: RO
+
+Andreas Zeugswetter <andreas.zeugswetter@telecom.at> writes:
+> That is what I use it for. I have never used it with a
+> returns setof function, but reading the comments in the regression test,
+> -- mike needs advil and peet's coffee,
+> -- joe and sally need hightops, and
+> -- everyone else is fine.
+> it looks like the results you expected are correct, and currently the
+> wrong result is given.
+
+Yes, I have concluded the same (and partially fixed it, per my previous
+message).
+
+> Those that don't have a hobbie should return name|NULL|NULL. A hobbie
+> that does'nt need equipment name|hobbie|NULL.
+
+That's a good point. Currently (both with and without my uncommitted
+fix) you get *no* rows out from ExecTargetList if there are any Iters
+that return empty result sets. It might be more reasonable to treat an
+empty result set as if it were NULL, which would give the behavior you
+suggest.
+
+This would be an easy change to my current patch, and I'm prepared to
+make it before committing what I have, if people agree that that's a
+more reasonable definition. Comments?
+
+ regards, tom lane
+
+************
+
+
+From owner-pgsql-hackers@hub.org Thu Sep 23 04:31:15 1999
+Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
+ by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id EAA11344
+ for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 04:31:15 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.2 $) with ESMTP id EAA05350 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 04:24:29 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (hub.org [216.126.84.1])
+ by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA85679;
+ Thu, 23 Sep 1999 04:16:26 -0400 (EDT)
+ (envelope-from owner-pgsql-hackers@hub.org)
+Received: by hub.org (TLB v0.10a (1.23 tibbs 1997/01/09 00:29:32)); Thu, 23 Sep 1999 04:09:52 +0000 (EDT)
+Received: (from majordom@localhost)
+ by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id EAA84708
+ for pgsql-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 04:08:57 -0400 (EDT)
+ (envelope-from owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org)
+Received: from gandalf.telecom.at (gandalf.telecom.at [194.118.26.84])
+ by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA84632
+ for <hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 04:08:03 -0400 (EDT)
+ (envelope-from andreas.zeugswetter@telecom.at)
+Received: from telecom.at (w0188000580.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at [172.18.65.249])
+ by gandalf.telecom.at (xxx/xxx) with ESMTP id KAA195294
+ for <hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 10:07:27 +0200
+Message-ID: <37E9DFBC.5C0978F@telecom.at>
+Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 10:07:24 +0200
+From: Andreas Zeugswetter <andreas.zeugswetter@telecom.at>
+X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win95; I)
+X-Accept-Language: en
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+To: hackers@postgreSQL.org
+Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Progress report: buffer refcount bugs and SQL functions
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+Sender: owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
+Precedence: bulk
+Status: RO
+
+> Is the regression test's expected output wrong, or am I
+> misunderstanding
+> what this query is supposed to do? Is there any
+> documentation anywhere
+> about how SQL functions returning multiple tuples are supposed to
+> behave?
+
+They are supposed to behave somewhat like a view.
+Not all rows are necessarily fetched.
+If used in a context that needs a single row answer,
+and the answer has multiple rows it is supposed to
+runtime elog. Like in:
+
+select * from tbl where col=funcreturningmultipleresults();
+-- this must elog
+
+while this is ok:
+select * from tbl where col in (select funcreturningmultipleresults());
+
+But the caller could only fetch the first row if he wanted.
+
+The nested notation is supposed to call the function passing it the tuple
+as the first argument. This is what can be used to "fake" a column
+onto a table (computed column).
+That is what I use it for. I have never used it with a
+returns setof function, but reading the comments in the regression test,
+-- mike needs advil and peet's coffee,
+-- joe and sally need hightops, and
+-- everyone else is fine.
+it looks like the results you expected are correct, and currently the
+wrong result is given.
+
+But I think this query could also elog whithout removing substantial
+functionality.
+
+SELECT p.name, p.hobbies.name, p.hobbies.equipment.name FROM person p;
+
+Actually for me it would be intuitive, that this query return one row per
+person, but elog on those that have more than one hobbie or a hobbie that
+needs more than one equipment. Those that don't have a hobbie should
+return name|NULL|NULL. A hobbie that does'nt need equipment name|hobbie|NULL.
+
+Andreas
+
+************
+
+
+From owner-pgsql-hackers@hub.org Wed Sep 22 22:01:07 1999
+Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
+ by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id WAA16360
+ for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 22 Sep 1999 22:01:05 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.2 $) with ESMTP id VAA08386 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 22 Sep 1999 21:37:24 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (hub.org [216.126.84.1])
+ by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA88083;
+ Wed, 22 Sep 1999 21:28:11 -0400 (EDT)
+ (envelope-from owner-pgsql-hackers@hub.org)
+Received: by hub.org (TLB v0.10a (1.23 tibbs 1997/01/09 00:29:32)); Wed, 22 Sep 1999 21:27:48 +0000 (EDT)
+Received: (from majordom@localhost)
+ by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA87938
+ for pgsql-hackers-outgoing; Wed, 22 Sep 1999 21:26:52 -0400 (EDT)
+ (envelope-from owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org)
+Received: from orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de (Tpolaris2.sapham.debis.de [53.2.131.8])
+ by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA87909
+ for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 22 Sep 1999 21:26:36 -0400 (EDT)
+ (envelope-from wieck@debis.com)
+Received: by orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
+ for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
+ id m11TxXw-0003kLC; Thu, 23 Sep 99 03:19 MET DST
+Message-Id: <m11TxXw-0003kLC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de>
+From: wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
+Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Progress report: buffer refcount bugs and SQL functions
+To: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane)
+Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 03:19:39 +0200 (MET DST)
+Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
+Reply-To: wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
+In-Reply-To: <6408.938045139@sss.pgh.pa.us> from "Tom Lane" at Sep 22, 99 08:05:39 pm
+X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
+Content-Type: text
+Sender: owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
+Precedence: bulk
+Status: RO
+
+Tom Lane wrote:
+
+> [...]
+>
+> What I am wondering, though, is whether this addition is actually
+> necessary, or is it a bug that the functions aren't run to completion
+> in the first place? I don't really understand the semantics of this
+> "nested dot notation". I suppose it is a Berkeleyism; I can't find
+> anything about it in the SQL92 document. The test cases shown in the
+> misc regress test seem peculiar, not to say wrong. For example:
+>
+> [...]
+>
+> Is the regression test's expected output wrong, or am I misunderstanding
+> what this query is supposed to do? Is there any documentation anywhere
+> about how SQL functions returning multiple tuples are supposed to
+> behave?
+
+ I've said some time (maybe too long) ago, that SQL functions
+ returning tuple sets are broken in general. This nested dot
+ notation (which I think is an artefact from the postquel
+ querylanguage) is implemented via set functions.
+
+ Set functions have total different semantics from all other
+ functions. First they don't really return a tuple set as
+ someone might think - all that screwed up code instead
+ simulates that they return something you could consider a
+ scan of the last SQL statement in the function. Then, on
+ each subsequent call inside of the same command, they return
+ a "tupletable slot" containing the next found tuple (that's
+ why their Func node is mangled up after the first call).
+
+ Second they have a targetlist what I think was originally
+ intended to extract attributes out of the tuples returned
+ when the above scan is asked to get the next tuple. But as I
+ read the code it invokes the function again and this might
+ cause the resource leakage you see.
+
+ Third, all this seems to never have been implemented
+ (thought?) to the end. A targetlist doesn't make sense at
+ this place because it could at max contain a single attribute
+ - so a single attno would have the same power. And if set
+ functions could appear in the rangetable (FROM clause), than
+ they would be treated as that and regular Var nodes in the
+ query would do it.
+
+ I think you shouldn't really care for that regression test
+ and maybe we should disable set functions until we really
+ implement stored procedures returning sets in the rangetable.
+
+ Set functions where planned by Stonebraker's team as
+ something that today is called stored procedures. But AFAIK
+ they never reached the useful state because even in Postgres
+ 4.2 you haven't been able to get more than one attribute out
+ of a set function. It was a feature of the postquel
+ querylanguage that you could get one attribute from a set
+ function via
+
+ RETRIEVE (attributename(setfuncname()))
+
+ While working on the constraint triggers I've came across
+ another regression test (triggers :-) that's errorneous too.
+ The funny_dup17 trigger proc executes an INSERT into the same
+ relation where it get fired for by a previous INSERT. And it
+ stops this recursion only if it reaches a nesting level of
+ 17, which could only occur if it is fired DURING the
+ execution of it's own SPI_exec(). After Vadim quouted some
+ SQL92 definitions about when constraint checks and triggers
+ are to be executed, I decided to fire regular triggers at the
+ end of a query too. Thus, there is absolutely no nesting
+ possible for AFTER triggers resulting in an endless loop.
+
+
+Jan
+
+--
+
+#======================================================================#
+# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
+# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
+#========================================= wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #
+
+
+
+************
+
+
--- /dev/null
+From owner-pgsql-hackers@hub.org Thu Sep 23 11:01:06 1999
+Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
+ by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id LAA16162
+ for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 11:01:04 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.1 $) with ESMTP id KAA28544 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 10:45:54 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (hub.org [216.126.84.1])
+ by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA52943;
+ Thu, 23 Sep 1999 10:20:51 -0400 (EDT)
+ (envelope-from owner-pgsql-hackers@hub.org)
+Received: by hub.org (TLB v0.10a (1.23 tibbs 1997/01/09 00:29:32)); Thu, 23 Sep 1999 10:19:58 +0000 (EDT)
+Received: (from majordom@localhost)
+ by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA52472
+ for pgsql-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 10:19:03 -0400 (EDT)
+ (envelope-from owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org)
+Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2])
+ by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA52431
+ for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 10:18:47 -0400 (EDT)
+ (envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
+Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+ by sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA13253;
+ Thu, 23 Sep 1999 10:18:02 -0400 (EDT)
+To: wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
+cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
+Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Progress report: buffer refcount bugs and SQL functions
+In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 23 Sep 1999 03:19:39 +0200 (MET DST)
+ <m11TxXw-0003kLC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de>
+Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 10:18:01 -0400
+Message-ID: <13251.938096281@sss.pgh.pa.us>
+From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
+Sender: owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
+Precedence: bulk
+Status: RO
+
+wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) writes:
+> Tom Lane wrote:
+>> What I am wondering, though, is whether this addition is actually
+>> necessary, or is it a bug that the functions aren't run to completion
+>> in the first place?
+
+> I've said some time (maybe too long) ago, that SQL functions
+> returning tuple sets are broken in general.
+
+Indeed they are. Try this on for size (using the regression database):
+
+ SELECT p.name, p.hobbies.equipment.name FROM person p;
+ SELECT p.hobbies.equipment.name, p.name FROM person p;
+
+You get different result sets!?
+
+The problem in this example is that ExecTargetList returns the isDone
+flag from the last targetlist entry, regardless of whether there are
+incomplete iterations in previous entries. More generally, the buffer
+leak problem that I started with only occurs if some Iter nodes are not
+run to completion --- but execQual.c has no mechanism to make sure that
+they have all reached completion simultaneously.
+
+What we really need to make functions-returning-sets work properly is
+an implementation somewhat like aggregate functions. We need to make
+a list of all the Iter nodes present in a targetlist and cycle through
+the values returned by each in a methodical fashion (run the rightmost
+through its full cycle, then advance the next-to-rightmost one value,
+run the rightmost through its cycle again, etc etc). Also there needs
+to be an understanding of the hierarchy when an Iter appears in the
+arguments of another Iter's function. (You cycle the upper one for
+*each* set of arguments created by cycling its sub-Iters.)
+
+I am not particularly interested in working on this feature right now,
+since AFAIK it's a Berkeleyism not found in SQL92. What I've done
+is to hack ExecTargetList so that it behaves semi-sanely when there's
+more than one Iter at the top level of the target list --- it still
+doesn't really give the right answer, but at least it will keep
+generating tuples until all the Iters are done at the same time.
+It happens that that's enough to give correct answers for the examples
+shown in the misc regress test. Even when it fails to generate all
+the possible combinations, there will be no buffer leaks.
+
+So, I'm going to declare victory and go home ;-). We ought to add a
+TODO item along the lines of
+ * Functions returning sets don't really work right
+in hopes that someone will feel like tackling this someday.
+
+ regards, tom lane
+
+************
+
+
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id WAA09988
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 1 Jun 1999 22:31:17 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (hub.org [209.167.229.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id WAA18944 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 1 Jun 1999 22:08:09 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (hub.org [209.167.229.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.5 $) with ESMTP id WAA18944 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 1 Jun 1999 22:08:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hub.org (hub.org [209.167.229.1])
by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA75604;
Tue, 1 Jun 1999 22:01:31 -0400 (EDT)
the least work.
+From owner-pgsql-general@hub.org Fri Jul 9 04:01:16 1999
+Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
+ by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id EAA22565
+ for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 04:01:15 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (hub.org [209.167.229.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.5 $) with ESMTP id DAA10238 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 03:56:46 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (hub.org [209.167.229.1])
+ by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA79895;
+ Fri, 9 Jul 1999 03:53:13 -0400 (EDT)
+ (envelope-from owner-pgsql-general@hub.org)
+Received: by hub.org (TLB v0.10a (1.23 tibbs 1997/01/09 00:29:32)); Fri, 09 Jul 1999 03:47:45 +0000 (EDT)
+Received: (from majordom@localhost)
+ by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id DAA79076
+ for pgsql-general-outgoing; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 03:47:43 -0400 (EDT)
+ (envelope-from owner-pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org)
+X-Authentication-Warning: hub.org: majordom set sender to owner-pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org using -f
+Received: from ns.idianet.net ([195.154.201.1])
+ by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA79054
+ for <pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 03:47:37 -0400 (EDT)
+ (envelope-from haj@idianet.net)
+Received: from kosovo (ppp150-paris2.isdnet.net [194.149.182.150])
+ by ns.idianet.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id JAA08143;
+ Fri, 9 Jul 1999 09:43:35 +0200 (CEST)
+Message-ID: <000c01bec9df$3704bd20$0601a8c0@kosovo.idianet.net>
+Reply-To: "Jonathan davis" <haj@idianet.net>
+From: "Jonathan davis" <haj@idianet.net>
+To: "Bruce Momjian" <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
+Cc: "Pgsql-General@Postgresql. Org" <pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org>
+Subject: Re: [GENERAL] just little BUG
+Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 09:46:42 +0200
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain;
+ charset="iso-8859-1"
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+X-Priority: 3
+X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
+X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
+X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
+Sender: owner-pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org
+Precedence: bulk
+Status: ROr
+
+
+
+>[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
+>> hello all
+>>
+>> normaly a UNIQUE PRIMARY KEY is unique but
+>> when you use a heritage, you can insert a duplicate key !!!!
+>
+>I assume you mean inheritance.
+>
+>Can you send us a little test sample please?
+>
+>--
+hello all
+
+this is the problem:
+
+example:
+
+test=> CREATE TABLE MAN(name char(10) UNIQUE PRIMARY KEY);T
+
+test=> CREATE TABLE PROFESSOR(scool char(20))INHERITS(MAN);
+
+test=> INSERT INTO PROFESSOR(name) VALUES('DAVIS');
+INSERT 54424 1
+
+test=> INSERT INTO PROFESSOR(name) VALUES('DAVIS');
+INSERT 54425 1
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id SAA24313
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 18:01:17 -0500 (EST)
-Received: from netcom15.netcom.com (zalman@netcom15.netcom.com [192.100.81.128]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id RAA15235 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 17:56:56 -0500 (EST)
+Received: from netcom15.netcom.com (zalman@netcom15.netcom.com [192.100.81.128]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.5 $) with ESMTP id RAA15235 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 17:56:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from zalman@localhost)
by netcom15.netcom.com (8.8.5-r-beta/8.8.5/(NETCOM v1.02)) id OAA28174;
Tue, 16 Mar 1999 14:55:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id JAA24574
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 09:01:00 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id HAA17762 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 07:47:57 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id HAA17762 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 07:47:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA09214;
Wed, 14 Oct 1998 07:04:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id LAA25519
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 11:02:02 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id JAA24583 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 09:46:21 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id JAA24583 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 09:46:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA17022;
Wed, 14 Oct 1998 08:59:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id LAA25510
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 11:01:59 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id KAA28854 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 10:40:56 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id KAA28854 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 10:40:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA21542;
Wed, 14 Oct 1998 10:03:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id LAA25504
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 11:01:51 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id KAA00198 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 10:57:15 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id KAA00198 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 10:57:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA22877;
Wed, 14 Oct 1998 10:19:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id NAA29300
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 13:55:56 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id NAA14245 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 13:49:19 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id NAA14245 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 13:49:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA13110;
Wed, 14 Oct 1998 13:25:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id NAA29303
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 13:55:58 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id NAA13463 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 13:39:05 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id NAA13463 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 13:39:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA11655;
Wed, 14 Oct 1998 13:13:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id NAA29290
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 13:55:51 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from dsh.de (firewall-user@neptun.sns-felb.debis.de [53.122.101.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id NAA14370 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 13:51:19 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from dsh.de (firewall-user@neptun.sns-felb.debis.de [53.122.101.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id NAA14370 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 13:51:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by dsh.de; id TAA03418; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 19:50:18 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from dshmail.dsh.de(53.47.15.3) by neptun.dsh.de via smap (3.2)
id xma003369; Wed, 14 Oct 98 19:49:51 +0200
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id QAA01119
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 16:31:05 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id PAA22534 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 15:29:50 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id PAA22534 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 15:29:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA26335;
Wed, 14 Oct 1998 15:05:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id RAA01591
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 17:31:21 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id RAA02744 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 17:26:53 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id RAA02744 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 17:26:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA05601;
Wed, 14 Oct 1998 17:03:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id AAA06040
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 00:01:04 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id XAA29020 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 23:57:58 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id XAA29020 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 23:57:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA02215;
Wed, 14 Oct 1998 22:39:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id KAA13960
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 10:01:15 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id JAA20266 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 09:12:21 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id JAA20266 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 09:12:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA26142;
Thu, 15 Oct 1998 08:19:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id OAA19803
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 14:32:31 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id NAA10847 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 13:38:16 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id NAA10847 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 13:38:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA22772;
Thu, 15 Oct 1998 12:07:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id UAA26050
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 20:31:00 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id UAA12888 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 20:10:03 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id UAA12888 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 20:10:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from cadzone ([126.0.1.40])
by sd.tpf.co.jp (2.0 Build 2131 (Berkeley 8.8.4)/8.8.4) with SMTP
id JAA02574; Fri, 16 Oct 1998 09:00:34 +0900
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id EAA02029
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 16 Oct 1998 04:01:04 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id DAA05509 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 16 Oct 1998 03:43:53 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id DAA05509 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 16 Oct 1998 03:43:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id CAA11278;
Fri, 16 Oct 1998 02:00:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id DAA01767
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 16 Oct 1998 03:31:00 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id DAA04551 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 16 Oct 1998 03:13:40 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id DAA04551 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 16 Oct 1998 03:13:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from cadzone ([126.0.1.40])
by sd.tpf.co.jp (2.0 Build 2131 (Berkeley 8.8.4)/8.8.4) with SMTP
id QAA02680; Fri, 16 Oct 1998 16:04:09 +0900
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id FAA02500
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 16 Oct 1998 05:01:02 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from dsh.de (firewall-user@neptun.sns-felb.debis.de [53.122.101.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id EAA06270 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 16 Oct 1998 04:13:59 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from dsh.de (firewall-user@neptun.sns-felb.debis.de [53.122.101.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id EAA06270 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 16 Oct 1998 04:13:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by dsh.de; id KAA11635; Fri, 16 Oct 1998 10:12:45 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from dshmail.dsh.de(53.47.15.3) by neptun.dsh.de via smap (3.2)
id xma011343; Fri, 16 Oct 98 10:12:15 +0200
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id MAA13063
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 16 Oct 1998 12:02:23 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id MAA18435 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 16 Oct 1998 12:01:46 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id MAA18435 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 16 Oct 1998 12:01:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA24469;
Fri, 16 Oct 1998 11:28:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id OAA01739
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 14:01:48 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from ra.sai.msu.su (ra.sai.msu.su [158.250.29.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id NAA23532 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 13:51:14 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from ra.sai.msu.su (ra.sai.msu.su [158.250.29.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id NAA23532 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 13:51:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ra (ra [158.250.29.2])
by ra.sai.msu.su (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id UAA17832;
Sun, 18 Oct 1998 20:45:25 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id OAA02288
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 14:31:10 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id OAA24844 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 14:15:35 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id OAA24844 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 14:15:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA26655;
Sun, 18 Oct 1998 14:00:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id TAA00573
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 19:08:46 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id QAA01305 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 16:14:30 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id QAA01305 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 16:14:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA06110;
Sun, 18 Oct 1998 15:55:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id TAA00557
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 19:08:37 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id QAA03555 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 16:56:03 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id QAA03555 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 16:56:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA10374;
Sun, 18 Oct 1998 16:36:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id HAA05591
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 07:31:09 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id HAA13574 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 07:12:57 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id HAA13574 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 07:12:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id GAA13957;
Mon, 19 Oct 1998 06:25:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id GAA02483
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 20 Oct 1998 06:01:48 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id FAA07799 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 20 Oct 1998 05:51:19 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id FAA07799 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 20 Oct 1998 05:51:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id FAA00108;
Tue, 20 Oct 1998 05:17:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id LAA01724
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 22 Oct 1998 11:33:31 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id LAA12702 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 22 Oct 1998 11:25:02 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id LAA12702 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 22 Oct 1998 11:25:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.9.1/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA11023;
Thu, 22 Oct 1998 10:22:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id LAA21185
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 22 Oct 1998 11:01:00 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from dsh.de (firewall-user@neptun.sns-felb.debis.de [53.122.101.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id KAA09646 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 22 Oct 1998 10:44:36 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from dsh.de (firewall-user@neptun.sns-felb.debis.de [53.122.101.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id KAA09646 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 22 Oct 1998 10:44:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by dsh.de; id QAA19394; Thu, 22 Oct 1998 16:43:42 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from dshmail.dsh.de(53.47.15.3) by neptun.dsh.de via smap (3.2)
id xma017268; Thu, 22 Oct 98 16:39:44 +0200
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id NAA01350
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 22 Oct 1998 13:12:29 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id MAA17808 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 22 Oct 1998 12:35:22 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id MAA17808 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 22 Oct 1998 12:35:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.9.1/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA14887;
Thu, 22 Oct 1998 10:49:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id PAA00521
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 15:46:40 -0500 (EST)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.145.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id PAA08772 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 15:10:01 -0500 (EST)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.145.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id PAA08772 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 15:10:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id PAA01254;
Wed, 16 Dec 1998 15:06:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id IAA24423
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 26 Nov 1998 08:31:08 -0500 (EST)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id IAA04554 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 26 Nov 1998 08:04:30 -0500 (EST)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id IAA04554 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 26 Nov 1998 08:04:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id HAA03761;
Thu, 26 Nov 1998 07:56:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id MAA24855
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sat, 20 Mar 1999 12:01:43 -0500 (EST)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.145.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id LAA11985 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sat, 20 Mar 1999 11:58:48 -0500 (EST)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.145.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id LAA11985 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sat, 20 Mar 1999 11:58:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.9.2/8.9.1) with SMTP id LAA12367;
Sat, 20 Mar 1999 11:57:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id QAA00139
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 16:01:45 -0500 (EST)
-Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [206.210.65.6]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id PAA27737 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 15:52:38 -0500 (EST)
+Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [206.210.65.6]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id PAA27737 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 15:52:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA14946;
Sun, 21 Mar 1999 15:50:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id QAA00149
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 16:01:48 -0500 (EST)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.145.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id PAA27950 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 15:56:07 -0500 (EST)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.145.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id PAA27950 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 15:56:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.9.2/8.9.1) with SMTP id PAA39413;
Sun, 21 Mar 1999 15:54:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id TAA00906
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 24 Mar 1999 19:10:52 -0500 (EST)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.145.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id NAA24258 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 24 Mar 1999 13:09:47 -0500 (EST)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.145.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id NAA24258 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 24 Mar 1999 13:09:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.9.2/8.9.1) with SMTP id NAA60743;
Wed, 24 Mar 1999 13:07:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id RAA20043
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 11 Oct 1998 17:31:02 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id RAA03069 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 11 Oct 1998 17:10:34 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id RAA03069 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 11 Oct 1998 17:10:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA10856;
Sun, 11 Oct 1998 16:57:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id SAA23978
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 18:43:39 -0500 (EST)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.145.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id SAA06472 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 18:36:44 -0500 (EST)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.145.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id SAA06472 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 18:36:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.9.2/8.9.1) with SMTP id SAA92604;
Mon, 22 Mar 1999 18:34:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id UAA00802
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 20:31:09 -0500 (EST)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.145.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id UAA13231 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 20:15:20 -0500 (EST)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.145.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id UAA13231 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 20:15:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.9.2/8.9.1) with SMTP id UAA01981;
Mon, 22 Mar 1999 20:14:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id XAA03384
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 23:30:58 -0500 (EST)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.145.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id XAA25586 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 23:18:25 -0500 (EST)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.145.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id XAA25586 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 23:18:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.9.2/8.9.1) with SMTP id XAA17955;
Mon, 22 Mar 1999 23:17:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id MAA17491
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 12:31:04 -0500 (EST)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.145.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id MAA08839 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 12:08:14 -0500 (EST)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.145.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id MAA08839 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 12:08:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.9.2/8.9.1) with SMTP id MAA93649;
Tue, 23 Mar 1999 12:04:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id MAA17484
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 12:31:01 -0500 (EST)
-Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [206.210.65.6]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id MAA09042 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 12:10:55 -0500 (EST)
+Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [206.210.65.6]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id MAA09042 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 12:10:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA24474;
Tue, 23 Mar 1999 12:09:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id MAA17488
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 12:31:02 -0500 (EST)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.145.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id MAA09987 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 12:21:34 -0500 (EST)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.145.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id MAA09987 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 12:21:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.9.2/8.9.1) with SMTP id MAA95155;
Tue, 23 Mar 1999 12:18:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id NAA07771
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 13:31:06 -0500 (EST)
-Received: from golem.jpl.nasa.gov (IDENT:root@hectic-2.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.68.204]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id NAA14597 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 13:27:37 -0500 (EST)
+Received: from golem.jpl.nasa.gov (IDENT:root@hectic-2.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.68.204]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id NAA14597 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 13:27:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from alumni.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by golem.jpl.nasa.gov (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA13416;
Thu, 7 Jan 1999 18:26:56 GMT
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id CAA22073
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 02:01:12 -0500 (EST)
-Received: from golem.jpl.nasa.gov (IDENT:root@hectic-2.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.68.204]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id BAA26054 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 01:57:00 -0500 (EST)
+Received: from golem.jpl.nasa.gov (IDENT:root@hectic-2.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.68.204]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id BAA26054 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 01:57:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from alumni.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by golem.jpl.nasa.gov (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA04715;
Mon, 22 Feb 1999 06:56:36 GMT
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id NAA21672
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 13:01:06 -0500 (EST)
-Received: from golem.jpl.nasa.gov (IDENT:root@hectic-2.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.68.204]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id MAA12756 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 12:14:16 -0500 (EST)
+Received: from golem.jpl.nasa.gov (IDENT:root@hectic-2.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.68.204]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id MAA12756 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 12:14:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from alumni.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by golem.jpl.nasa.gov (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA09406;
Mon, 1 Mar 1999 17:10:49 GMT
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id VAA15978
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 21:54:57 -0500 (EST)
-Received: from golem.jpl.nasa.gov (IDENT:root@hectic-1.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.68.203]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id VAA15837 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 21:48:33 -0500 (EST)
+Received: from golem.jpl.nasa.gov (IDENT:root@hectic-1.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.68.203]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id VAA15837 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 21:48:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from alumni.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by golem.jpl.nasa.gov (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA06996;
Tue, 9 Mar 1999 02:46:40 GMT
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA03006
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 11 May 1998 11:31:07 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id LAA01663 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 11 May 1998 11:24:42 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id LAA01663 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 11 May 1998 11:24:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost) by hub.org (8.8.8/8.7.5) with SMTP id LAA21841; Mon, 11 May 1998 11:15:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by hub.org (TLB v0.10a (1.23 tibbs 1997/01/09 00:29:32)); Mon, 11 May 1998 11:15:12 +0000 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.org (8.8.8/8.7.5) id LAA21683 for pgsql-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 11 May 1998 11:15:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA15937
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 2 Aug 1998 20:01:11 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id TAA01026 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 2 Aug 1998 19:33:53 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id TAA01026 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 2 Aug 1998 19:33:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost) by hub.org (8.8.8/8.7.5) with SMTP id TAA19878; Sun, 2 Aug 1998 19:30:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by hub.org (TLB v0.10a (1.23 tibbs 1997/01/09 00:29:32)); Sun, 02 Aug 1998 19:28:23 +0000 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.org (8.8.8/8.7.5) id TAA19534 for pgsql-hackers-outgoing; Sun, 2 Aug 1998 19:28:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA01047
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 4 Sep 1998 00:47:05 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id XAA02044 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 23:11:07 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id XAA02044 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 23:11:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost) by hub.org (8.8.8/8.7.5) with SMTP id XAA27418; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 23:06:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by hub.org (TLB v0.10a (1.23 tibbs 1997/01/09 00:29:32)); Thu, 03 Sep 1998 23:04:11 +0000 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.org (8.8.8/8.7.5) id XAA27185 for pgsql-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 23:04:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA14437
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sat, 5 Sep 1998 02:01:11 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id BAA09928 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sat, 5 Sep 1998 01:48:32 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id BAA09928 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sat, 5 Sep 1998 01:48:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost) by hub.org (8.8.8/8.7.5) with SMTP id BAA18282; Sat, 5 Sep 1998 01:43:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by hub.org (TLB v0.10a (1.23 tibbs 1997/01/09 00:29:32)); Sat, 05 Sep 1998 01:41:40 +0000 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.org (8.8.8/8.7.5) id BAA18241 for pgsql-hackers-outgoing; Sat, 5 Sep 1998 01:41:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id FAA07543
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 05:31:09 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id FAA19587 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 05:12:03 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id FAA19587 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 05:12:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hub.org (hub.org [216.126.84.1])
by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA55119;
Tue, 21 Sep 1999 04:48:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id IAA09071
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 08:31:02 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id IAA25991 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 08:04:59 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id IAA25991 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 08:04:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hub.org (hub.org [216.126.84.1])
by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA82019;
Tue, 21 Sep 1999 07:48:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id PAA14590
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 15:30:28 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id PAA09192 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 15:06:09 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id PAA09192 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 15:06:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hub.org (hub.org [216.126.84.1])
by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA73126;
Tue, 21 Sep 1999 14:56:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id RAA01594
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 17:31:24 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with ESMTP id RAA01745 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 17:12:28 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from hub.org (majordom@hub.org [209.47.148.200]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.8 $) with ESMTP id RAA01745 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 17:12:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA06607;
Wed, 14 Oct 1998 17:10:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA16564
for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sat, 25 Jul 1998 05:31:03 -0400 (EDT)
-Received: from antares.mcs.anl.gov (mcs.anl.gov [140.221.9.6]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.6 $) with SMTP id FAA01775 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sat, 25 Jul 1998 05:28:22 -0400 (EDT)
+Received: from antares.mcs.anl.gov (mcs.anl.gov [140.221.9.6]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.7 $) with SMTP id FAA01775 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sat, 25 Jul 1998 05:28:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mcs.anl.gov (wit.mcs.anl.gov [140.221.5.148]) by antares.mcs.anl.gov (8.6.10/8.6.10) with ESMTP
id EAA28698 for <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sat, 25 Jul 1998 04:27:05 -0500
Sender: selkovjr@mcs.anl.gov
projects / postgresql / commitdiff