support it. I don't know what evaluation method we use for complex
arithmetic, so I don't know whether/if we should warn about use of
CX_LIMITED_RANGE.
This concludes my planned hacking on STDC pragmas, flame away :)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@69556
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
def ext_stdc_pragma_syntax_eom :
ExtWarn<"expected end of macro in STDC pragma">,
InGroup<UnknownPragmas>;
+def warn_stdc_fenv_access_not_supported :
+ ExtWarn<"pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON is not supported, ignoring pragma">,
+ InGroup<UnknownPragmas>;
+
def err_pragma_comment_unknown_kind : Error<"unknown kind of pragma comment">;
def err_defined_macro_name : Error<"'defined' cannot be used as a macro name">;
def err_paste_at_start : Error<
struct PragmaSTDC_FENV_ACCESSHandler : public PragmaHandler {
PragmaSTDC_FENV_ACCESSHandler(const IdentifierInfo *ID) : PragmaHandler(ID) {}
virtual void HandlePragma(Preprocessor &PP, Token &Tok) {
- LexOnOffSwitch(PP);
+ if (LexOnOffSwitch(PP) == STDC_ON)
+ PP.Diag(Tok, diag::warn_stdc_fenv_access_not_supported);
}
};
#pragma STDC FP_CONTRACT DEFAULT
#pragma STDC FP_CONTRACT IN_BETWEEN // expected-warning {{expected 'ON' or 'OFF' or 'DEFAULT' in pragma}}
-#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON
+#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON // expected-warning {{pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON is not supported, ignoring pragma}}
#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS OFF
#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS DEFAULT
#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS IN_BETWEEN // expected-warning {{expected 'ON' or 'OFF' or 'DEFAULT' in pragma}}