Clang emits a warning when using a pure specifier =0 in a function definition
at class scope (a MS-specific construct), when using -fms-extensions.
However, to detect this, it was using FD->isCanonicalDecl() on function
declaration, which was also detecting out-of-class definition of member
functions of class templates. Fix this by using !FD->isOutOfLine() instead.
Fixes PR21334.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29707
Reviewed By: riccibruno
Reviewers: rnk, riccibruno
Patch By: Rudy Pons
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@358849
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
// MSVC permits the use of pure specifier (=0) on function definition,
// defined at class scope, warn about this non-standard construct.
- if (getLangOpts().MicrosoftExt && FD->isPure() && FD->isCanonicalDecl())
+ if (getLangOpts().MicrosoftExt && FD->isPure() && !FD->isOutOfLine())
Diag(FD->getLocation(), diag::ext_pure_function_definition);
if (!FD->isInvalidDecl()) {
virtual ~pure_virtual_dtor_inline() = 0 { }// expected-warning {{function definition with pure-specifier is a Microsoft extension}}
};
+template<typename T> struct pure_virtual_dtor_template {
+ virtual ~pure_virtual_dtor_template() = 0;
+};
+template<typename T> pure_virtual_dtor_template<T>::~pure_virtual_dtor_template() {}
+template struct pure_virtual_dtor_template<int>;
+
+template<typename T> struct pure_virtual_dtor_template_inline {
+ virtual ~pure_virtual_dtor_template_inline() = 0 {}
+ // expected-warning@-1 2{{function definition with pure-specifier is a Microsoft extension}}
+};
+template struct pure_virtual_dtor_template_inline<int>;
+// expected-note@-1 {{in instantiation of member function}}
int main () {
// Necessary to force instantiation in -fdelayed-template-parsing mode.