Put analyze_keyword back in explain_option_name production.

In commit 2c92edad48796119c83d7dbe6c33425d1924626d, I broke "EXPLAIN
(ANALYZE)" syntax, because I mistakenly thought that ANALYZE/ANALYSE were
only partially reserved and thus would be included in NonReservedWord;
but actually they're fully reserved so they still need to be called out
here.

A nicer solution would be to demote these words to type_func_name_keyword
status (they can't be less than that because of "VACUUM [ANALYZE] ColId").
While that works fine so far as the core grammar is concerned, it breaks
ECPG's grammar for reasons I don't have time to isolate at the moment.
So do this for the time being.

Per report from Kevin Grittner.  Back-patch to 9.0, like the previous
commit.

diff --git a/src/backend/parser/gram.y b/src/backend/parser/gram.y
index 321b6ddff317f59748b92b26befd4b0f568ccde2..0e8cd30326e15fc89f14e188e07ed3cbe45c746b 100644 (file)
--- a/src/backend/parser/gram.y
+++ b/src/backend/parser/gram.y
@@ -8316,6 +8316,7 @@ explain_option_elem:
 
 explain_option_name:
                        NonReservedWord                 { $$ = $1; }
+                       | analyze_keyword               { $$ = "analyze"; }
                ;
 
 explain_option_arg: