// have one) and, if that fails to find a match, in the scope (if
// we're allowed to look there).
Found.clear();
- if (Step == 0 && LookupCtx)
+ if (Step == 0 && LookupCtx) {
+ if (RequireCompleteDeclContext(SS, LookupCtx))
+ return nullptr;
LookupQualifiedName(Found, LookupCtx);
- else if (Step == 1 && LookInScope && S)
+ } else if (Step == 1 && LookInScope && S) {
LookupName(Found, S);
- else
+ } else {
continue;
+ }
// FIXME: Should we be suppressing ambiguities here?
if (Found.isAmbiguous())
struct Y; // expected-note{{forward declaration of 'Y'}}
Y::foo y; // expected-error{{incomplete type 'Y' named in nested name specifier}}
+namespace PR25156 {
+struct Y; // expected-note{{forward declaration of 'PR25156::Y'}}
+void foo() {
+ Y::~Y(); // expected-error{{incomplete type 'PR25156::Y' named in nested name specifier}}
+}
+}
+
X::X() : a(5) { } // expected-error{{use of undeclared identifier 'X'}}
struct foo_S {