This trips over a few other limitations, but in the interests of incremental development I'm starting here & I'll look at the issues with -verify and filesystem checks (the fact that the behavior depends on the existence of a 'foo' directory even though it shouldn't need it), etc.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61656
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@360195
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
///
/// \returns The submodule if found, or NULL otherwise.
Module *findSubmodule(StringRef Name) const;
+ Module *findOrInferSubmodule(StringRef Name);
/// Determine whether the specified module would be visible to
/// a lookup at the end of this module.
return SubModules[Pos->getValue()];
}
+Module *Module::findOrInferSubmodule(StringRef Name) {
+ llvm::StringMap<unsigned>::const_iterator Pos = SubModuleIndex.find(Name);
+ if (Pos != SubModuleIndex.end())
+ return SubModules[Pos->getValue()];
+ if (!InferSubmodules)
+ return nullptr;
+ Module *Result = new Module(Name, SourceLocation(), this, false, InferExplicitSubmodules, 0);
+ Result->InferExplicitSubmodules = InferExplicitSubmodules;
+ Result->InferSubmodules = InferSubmodules;
+ Result->InferExportWildcard = InferExportWildcard;
+ if (Result->InferExportWildcard)
+ Result->Exports.push_back(Module::ExportDecl(nullptr, true));
+ return Result;
+}
+
void Module::getExportedModules(SmallVectorImpl<Module *> &Exported) const {
// All non-explicit submodules are exported.
for (std::vector<Module *>::const_iterator I = SubModules.begin(),
// Find the module we're entering. We require that a module map for it
// be loaded or implicitly loadable.
- // FIXME: We could create the submodule here. We'd need to know whether
- // it's supposed to be explicit, but not much else.
- Module *M = PP.getHeaderSearchInfo().lookupModule(Current);
+ auto &HSI = PP.getHeaderSearchInfo();
+ Module *M = HSI.lookupModule(Current);
if (!M) {
PP.Diag(ModuleName.front().second,
diag::err_pp_module_begin_no_module_map) << Current;
return;
}
for (unsigned I = 1; I != ModuleName.size(); ++I) {
- auto *NewM = M->findSubmodule(ModuleName[I].first->getName());
+ auto *NewM = M->findOrInferSubmodule(ModuleName[I].first->getName());
if (!NewM) {
PP.Diag(ModuleName[I].second, diag::err_pp_module_begin_no_submodule)
<< M->getFullModuleName() << ModuleName[I].first;
--- /dev/null
+// FIXME: The standalone module still seems to cause clang to want to test for
+// the existence of a 'foo' directory:
+// RUN: mkdir %t
+// RUN: cp %s %t
+// RUN: mkdir %t/foo
+// RUN: cd %t
+// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -fmodules -fsyntax-only %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+
+// CHECK: error: no matching function for call to 'foo'
+// CHECK: note: candidate function not viable: requires 0 arguments, but 1 was provided
+
+// FIXME: This should use -verify, but it seems it doesn't hook up the
+// SourceManager correctly or something, and the foo.h note gets attributed to
+// the synthetic module translation unit "foo.map Line 2:...".
+// %clang_cc1 -fmodules -verify %s
+
+#pragma clang module build foo
+module foo {
+ umbrella "foo"
+ module * {
+ export *
+ }
+}
+#pragma clang module contents
+#pragma clang module begin foo.foo
+# 1 "foo.h" 1
+#ifndef FOO_FOO_H
+void foo();
+#endif
+#pragma clang module end
+#pragma clang module endbuild
+#pragma clang module import foo.foo
+// expected-note@foo.h:2 {{candidate function not viable: requires 0 arguments, but 1 was provided}}
+int main() {
+ foo(1); // expected-error {{no matching function for call to 'foo'}}
+}