Reduce precision test to 1cm2. There is no doubt that this approach is less numerical...

git-svn-id: http://svn.osgeo.org/postgis/trunk@10424 b70326c6-7e19-0410-871a-916f4a2858ee

diff --git a/liblwgeom/cunit/cu_geodetic.c b/liblwgeom/cunit/cu_geodetic.c
index 6b3b57e711d65d8b51d2565a28431df4587effa0..ae41d6b77576676d12f8bbd816d11c0571a9bfe0 100644 (file)
--- a/liblwgeom/cunit/cu_geodetic.c
+++ b/liblwgeom/cunit/cu_geodetic.c
@@ -990,8 +990,8 @@ static void test_spheroid_area(void)
        a1 = lwgeom_area_sphere(lwg, &s);
        a2 = lwgeom_area_spheroid(lwg, &s);
        printf("\nsphere: %.12g\nspheroid: %.12g\n", a1, a2);
-       CU_ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQUAL(a1, 89.7127703297, 0.001); /* sphere */
-       CU_ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQUAL(a2, 89.8684316032, 0.001); /* spheroid */
+       CU_ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQUAL(a1, 89.7127703297, 0.1); /* sphere */
+       CU_ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQUAL(a2, 89.8684316032, 0.1); /* spheroid */
        lwgeom_free(lwg);
 
        /* Big-ass polygon */
@@ -1170,7 +1170,7 @@ static void test_lwgeom_area_sphere(void)
        lwg = lwgeom_from_wkt("POLYGON((1 1, 1 2, 2 2, 2 1, 1 1))", LW_PARSER_CHECK_NONE);
        area = lwgeom_area_sphere(lwg, &s);
        
-       CU_ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQUAL(area, 12360265021.3561, 0.01);
+       CU_ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQUAL(area, 12360265021.3561, 1.0);
        lwgeom_free(lwg);       
        return;
 }