return false;
}
+namespace {
+
+// Callback to only accept typo corrections that can be a valid C++ member
+// intializer: either a non-static field member or a base class.
+class NestedNameSpecifierValidatorCCC : public CorrectionCandidateCallback {
+ public:
+ explicit NestedNameSpecifierValidatorCCC(Sema &SRef)
+ : SRef(SRef) {}
+
+ virtual bool ValidateCandidate(const TypoCorrection &candidate) {
+ return SRef.isAcceptableNestedNameSpecifier(candidate.getCorrectionDecl());
+ }
+
+ private:
+ Sema &SRef;
+};
+
+}
+
/// \brief Build a new nested-name-specifier for "identifier::", as described
/// by ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier.
///
// We haven't found anything, and we're not recovering from a
// different kind of error, so look for typos.
DeclarationName Name = Found.getLookupName();
+ NestedNameSpecifierValidatorCCC Validator(*this);
TypoCorrection Corrected;
Found.clear();
if ((Corrected = CorrectTypo(Found.getLookupNameInfo(),
- Found.getLookupKind(), S, &SS, LookupCtx,
- EnteringContext, CTC_NoKeywords)) &&
- isAcceptableNestedNameSpecifier(Corrected.getCorrectionDecl())) {
+ Found.getLookupKind(), S, &SS, &Validator,
+ LookupCtx, EnteringContext))) {
std::string CorrectedStr(Corrected.getAsString(getLangOptions()));
std::string CorrectedQuotedStr(Corrected.getQuoted(getLangOptions()));
if (LookupCtx)
double FieldA; // expected-note{{'FieldA' declared here}}
};
st var = { .fielda = 0.0 }; // expected-error{{field designator 'fielda' does not refer to any field in type 'st'; did you mean 'FieldA'?}}
+
+// Test the improvement from passing a callback object to CorrectTypo in
+// Sema::BuildCXXNestedNameSpecifier.
+typedef char* another_str;
+namespace AnotherStd { // expected-note{{'AnotherStd' declared here}}
+ class string {};
+}
+another_std::string str; // expected-error{{use of undeclared identifier 'another_std'; did you mean 'AnotherStd'?}}