The user specifies a long option but forgets to type the second
leading dash, we currently detect and report that fact if its first
letter is a valid short option. This is done for safety, to avoid
ambiguity between short options (and their arguments) and a long
option with a missing dash.
This diagnostic message is also helpful for long options whose first
letter is not a valid short option, however. Print it in that case,
too, as a courtesy.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
case -1:
return parse_options_usage(ctx, usagestr, options, 1);
case -2:
+ if (ctx->opt)
+ check_typos(arg + 1, options);
goto unknown;
}
if (ctx->opt)
test_cmp typo.err output.err
'
+cat > typo.err << EOF
+error: did you mean \`--ambiguous\` (with two dashes ?)
+EOF
+
+test_expect_success 'detect possible typos' '
+ test_must_fail test-parse-options -ambiguous > output 2> output.err &&
+ test ! -s output &&
+ test_cmp typo.err output.err
+'
+
cat > expect <<EOF
boolean: 0
integer: 0