`Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?` is mostly providing no benefits. When a PR author wants the reviewer to double check sth in particular, they can somewhere.
Additionally, passing tests should (obviously) also be part of the acceptance criteria.
* **What does this PR do?**
-* **Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?**
-
* **Screenshots (if relevant)**
* **Does this PR meet the acceptance criteria?** (This is just a reminder for you,
[doc/manual.xml.head](https://www.github.com/neomutt/neomutt/blob/master/doc/manual.xml.head)
for that)
- - All builds are passing
+ - All builds and tests are passing
- Added [doxygen code documentation](https://neomutt.org/dev/doxygen)
[syntax](http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/manual/docblocks.html)