In `ParseDeclarationSpecifiers` for the code
class A typename A;
we were able to annotate token `kw_typename` because it refers to
existing type. But later during processing token `annot_typename` we
failed to `SetTypeSpecType` and exited switch statement leaving
annotation token unconsumed. The code after the switch statement failed
because it didn't expect a special token.
The fix is not to assume that switch statement consumes all special
tokens and consume any token, not just non-special.
rdar://problem/
37099386
Reviewers: rsmith, arphaman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: jkorous-apple, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44449
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@329735
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
DS.SetRangeEnd(Tok.getLocation());
if (DiagID != diag::err_bool_redeclaration)
- ConsumeToken();
+ // After an error the next token can be an annotation token.
+ ConsumeAnyToken();
AttrsLastTime = false;
}
}
}
+namespace rdar37099386 {
+ class A typename A; // expected-error {{expected a qualified name after 'typename'}}
+ // expected-error@-1 {{cannot combine with previous 'class' declaration specifier}}
+}
+
// PR8380
extern "" // expected-error {{unknown linkage language}}
test6a { ;// expected-error {{C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations}}