Owen pointed out that this made no sense :)

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@40644 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/docs/InternalsManual.html b/docs/InternalsManual.html
index 3b49c9c6196b2599d779985abc81d04dd693f145..eb36a790d3f8a2851987be10f1f56e28a95ca8f7 100644 (file)
--- a/docs/InternalsManual.html
+++ b/docs/InternalsManual.html
@@ -349,9 +349,9 @@ typedef for foo.
 <p>Representing types like this is great for diagnostics, because the
 user-specified type is always immediately available.  There are two problems
 with this: first, various semantic checks need to make judgements about the
-<em>structure</em> of a type, not its structure.  Second, we need an efficient
-way to query whether two types are structurally identical to each other,
-ignoring typedefs.  The solution to both of these problems is the idea of
+<em>actual structure</em> of a type, ignoring typdefs.  Second, we need an
+efficient way to query whether two types are structurally identical to each
+other, ignoring typedefs.  The solution to both of these problems is the idea of
 canonical types.</p>
 
 <h4>Canonical Types</h4>