]> granicus.if.org Git - apache/commitdiff
This issue is completed.
authorJustin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@apache.org>
Wed, 6 Feb 2002 22:34:47 +0000 (22:34 +0000)
committerJustin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@apache.org>
Wed, 6 Feb 2002 22:34:47 +0000 (22:34 +0000)
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@93323 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

STATUS

diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS
index f2ddcee8d870390a119753616ff74a4ea84abdb1..2a6596ab1c76c52b084e7ae1104f078171f016aa 100644 (file)
--- a/STATUS
+++ b/STATUS
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 APACHE 2.0 STATUS:                                              -*-text-*-
-Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/06 22:32:34 $]
+Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/06 22:34:47 $]
 
 Release:
 
@@ -492,21 +492,6 @@ RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP:
                    useful as a perl dbm management example?  If we keep it,
                    do we address the issue above?
 
-    * use apu_dbm in mod_auth_dbm
-        Status: Greg +1 (low-priority volunteer)
-        Justin says: "Seems like this is already there, so should we just 
-                      remove the other DBM code in that file?  If you want 
-                      to use gdbm, or dbm, etc, you should tell apr-util."
-        Will says: "bs - I may choose the fastest - most efficient native
-                    dbm implementation, for shared proc caches, ssl session
-                    caching, etc, but that has nothing to do with maintaining
-                    a userlist via dbm, which has to remain readable between
-                    builds/machines, etc.  The use-multiple database schema
-                    for apr-util would let us do this with just apr, though."
-        Ian says:  "multi-dbm is in, but it still has ndbm support hardcoded
-                    is this still required? isn't ndbm supported via gdbm?"
-
-
     * Integrate mod_dav.
         Some additional items remaining:
         - case_preserved_filename stuff