Call expressions that return objects by an lvalue reference or an rvalue
reference have a value type in the AST but wear an auxiliary flag of being an
lvalue or an xvalue respectively.
Use the helper method for obtaining the actual return type of the function.
Fixes a crash.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44273
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@327352
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
public:
/// Returns true when call expression \p CE needs to be represented
/// by CFGCXXRecordTypedCall, as opposed to a regular CFGStmt.
- static bool isCXXRecordTypedCall(CallExpr *CE) {
- return CE->getType().getCanonicalType()->getAsCXXRecordDecl();
+ static bool isCXXRecordTypedCall(CallExpr *CE, const ASTContext &ACtx) {
+ return CE->getCallReturnType(ACtx).getCanonicalType()->getAsCXXRecordDecl();
}
explicit CFGCXXRecordTypedCall(CallExpr *CE,
- const TemporaryObjectConstructionContext *C)
+ const TemporaryObjectConstructionContext *C)
: CFGStmt(CE, CXXRecordTypedCall) {
- assert(isCXXRecordTypedCall(CE));
+ // FIXME: This is not protected against squeezing a non-record-typed-call
+ // into the constructor. An assertion would require passing an ASTContext
+ // which would mean paying for something we don't use.
assert(C);
Data2.setPointer(const_cast<TemporaryObjectConstructionContext *>(C));
}
void appendCall(CFGBlock *B, CallExpr *CE) {
if (BuildOpts.AddRichCXXConstructors) {
- if (CFGCXXRecordTypedCall::isCXXRecordTypedCall(CE)) {
+ if (CFGCXXRecordTypedCall::isCXXRecordTypedCall(CE, *Context)) {
if (const ConstructionContextLayer *Layer =
ConstructionContextMap.lookup(CE)) {
const ConstructionContext *CC =
case Stmt::CXXOperatorCallExprClass:
case Stmt::UserDefinedLiteralClass: {
auto *CE = cast<CallExpr>(Child);
- if (CFGCXXRecordTypedCall::isCXXRecordTypedCall(CE))
+ if (CFGCXXRecordTypedCall::isCXXRecordTypedCall(CE, *Context))
consumeConstructionContext(Layer, CE);
break;
}
return 0;
}
+namespace pass_references_through {
+class C {
+public:
+ ~C() {}
+};
+
+const C &foo1();
+C &&foo2();
+
+// In these examples the foo() expression has record type, not reference type.
+// Don't try to figure out how to perform construction of the record here.
+const C &bar1() { return foo1(); } // no-crash
+C &&bar2() { return foo2(); } // no-crash
+} // end namespace pass_references_through
+
// CHECK: [B1 (ENTRY)]
// CHECK: Succs (1): B0
// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
// CHECK: Succs (2): B8 B1
// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
// CHECK: Preds (3): B1 B2 B4
+// CHECK: [B1 (ENTRY)]
+// CHECK: Succs (1): B0
+// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
+// CHECK: Preds (1): B1
+// CHECK: [B2 (ENTRY)]
+// CHECK: Succs (1): B1
+// CHECK: [B1]
+// CHECK: 1: foo1
+// CHECK: 2: [B1.1] (ImplicitCastExpr, FunctionToPointerDecay, const class pass_references_through::C &(*)(void))
+// CHECK: 3: [B1.2]()
+// CHECK: 4: return [B1.3];
+// CHECK: Preds (1): B2
+// CHECK: Succs (1): B0
+// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
+// CHECK: Preds (1): B1
+// CHECK: [B2 (ENTRY)]
+// CHECK: Succs (1): B1
+// CHECK: [B1]
+// CHECK: 1: foo2
+// CHECK: 2: [B1.1] (ImplicitCastExpr, FunctionToPointerDecay, class pass_references_through::C &&(*)(void))
+// CHECK: 3: [B1.2]()
+// CHECK: 4: return [B1.3];
+// CHECK: Preds (1): B2
+// CHECK: Succs (1): B0
+// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
+// CHECK: Preds (1): B1
}
} // end namespace implicit_constructor_conversion
+namespace pass_references_through {
+class C {
+public:
+ ~C() {}
+};
+
+const C &foo1();
+C &&foo2();
+// In these examples the foo() expression has record type, not reference type.
+// Don't try to figure out how to perform construction of the record here.
+const C &bar1() { return foo1(); } // no-crash
+C &&bar2() { return foo2(); } // no-crash
+} // end namespace pass_references_through