Fix pass dependency for LICM

Expected to address buildbot failure http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/builds/16285 caused by D65060.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@368542 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp
index 546c563069b78243a6e1a2dc1a54f8b394cdf1da..4d76f647a81ebe23af3588eca41e375d20821e56 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp
@@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ char LegacyLICMPass::ID = 0;
 INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(LegacyLICMPass, "licm", "Loop Invariant Code Motion",
                       false, false)
 INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LoopPass)
+INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(BlockFrequencyInfoWrapperPass)
 INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass)
 INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(TargetTransformInfoWrapperPass)
 INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(MemorySSAWrapperPass)
@@ -333,8 +334,8 @@ Pass *llvm::createLICMPass(unsigned LicmMssaOptCap,
 ///
 bool LoopInvariantCodeMotion::runOnLoop(
     Loop *L, AliasAnalysis *AA, LoopInfo *LI, DominatorTree *DT,
-    BlockFrequencyInfo *BFI, TargetLibraryInfo *TLI, TargetTransformInfo *TTI, 
-    ScalarEvolution *SE, MemorySSA *MSSA, OptimizationRemarkEmitter *ORE, 
+    BlockFrequencyInfo *BFI, TargetLibraryInfo *TLI, TargetTransformInfo *TTI,
+    ScalarEvolution *SE, MemorySSA *MSSA, OptimizationRemarkEmitter *ORE,
     bool DeleteAST) {
   bool Changed = false;
 
@@ -502,8 +503,8 @@ bool LoopInvariantCodeMotion::runOnLoop(
 ///
 bool llvm::sinkRegion(DomTreeNode *N, AliasAnalysis *AA, LoopInfo *LI,
                       DominatorTree *DT, BlockFrequencyInfo *BFI,
-                      TargetLibraryInfo *TLI, TargetTransformInfo *TTI, 
-                      Loop *CurLoop, AliasSetTracker *CurAST, 
+                      TargetLibraryInfo *TLI, TargetTransformInfo *TTI,
+                      Loop *CurLoop, AliasSetTracker *CurAST,
                       MemorySSAUpdater *MSSAU,
                       ICFLoopSafetyInfo *SafetyInfo,
                       SinkAndHoistLICMFlags &Flags,
@@ -1593,7 +1594,7 @@ static void splitPredecessorsOfLoopExit(PHINode *PN, DominatorTree *DT,
 /// position, and may either delete it or move it to outside of the loop.
 ///
 static bool sink(Instruction &I, LoopInfo *LI, DominatorTree *DT,
-                 BlockFrequencyInfo *BFI, const Loop *CurLoop, 
+                 BlockFrequencyInfo *BFI, const Loop *CurLoop,
                  ICFLoopSafetyInfo *SafetyInfo, MemorySSAUpdater *MSSAU,
                  OptimizationRemarkEmitter *ORE) {
   LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LICM sinking instruction: " << I << "\n");
@@ -2026,7 +2027,7 @@ bool llvm::promoteLoopAccessesToScalars(
         // Note that proving a load safe to speculate requires proving
         // sufficient alignment at the target location.  Proving it guaranteed
         // to execute does as well.  Thus we can increase our guaranteed
-        // alignment as well. 
+        // alignment as well.
         if (!DereferenceableInPH || (InstAlignment > Alignment))
           if (isSafeToExecuteUnconditionally(*Load, DT, CurLoop, SafetyInfo,
                                              ORE, Preheader->getTerminator())) {