WalSndKill was doing things exactly backwards: it should first clear
MyWalSnd (to stop signal handlers from touching MyWalSnd->latch),
then disown the latch, and only then mark the WalSnd struct unused by
clearing its pid field.
Also, WalRcvSigUsr1Handler and worker_spi_sighup failed to preserve
errno, which is surely a requirement for any signal handler.
Per discussion of recent buildfarm failures. Back-patch as far
as the relevant code exists.
#include "tcop/utility.h"
PG_MODULE_MAGIC;
+
PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(worker_spi_launch);
void _PG_init(void);
/*
* Signal handler for SIGHUP
- * Set a flag to let the main loop to reread the config file, and set
+ * Set a flag to tell the main loop to reread the config file, and set
* our latch to wake it up.
*/
static void
worker_spi_sighup(SIGNAL_ARGS)
{
+ int save_errno = errno;
+
got_sighup = true;
if (MyProc)
SetLatch(&MyProc->procLatch);
+
+ errno = save_errno;
}
/*
static void
WalRcvSigUsr1Handler(SIGNAL_ARGS)
{
+ int save_errno = errno;
+
latch_sigusr1_handler();
+
+ errno = save_errno;
}
/* SIGTERM: set flag for main loop, or shutdown immediately if safe */
static void
WalSndKill(int code, Datum arg)
{
- Assert(MyWalSnd != NULL);
+ WalSnd *walsnd = MyWalSnd;
+
+ Assert(walsnd != NULL);
+
+ /*
+ * Clear MyWalSnd first; then disown the latch. This is so that signal
+ * handlers won't try to touch the latch after it's no longer ours.
+ */
+ MyWalSnd = NULL;
+
+ DisownLatch(&walsnd->latch);
/*
* Mark WalSnd struct no longer in use. Assume that no lock is required
* for this.
*/
- MyWalSnd->pid = 0;
- DisownLatch(&MyWalSnd->latch);
-
- /* WalSnd struct isn't mine anymore */
- MyWalSnd = NULL;
+ walsnd->pid = 0;
}
/*