The checker marks the locations where the analyzer creates sinks. However, it
can happen that the sink was created because of a loop which does not contain
condition statement, only breaks in the body. The exhausted block is the block
which should contain the condition but empty, in this case.
This change only emits this marking in order to avoid the undefined behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42266
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@325693
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
E = CE.blocks_exhausted_end(); I != E; ++I) {
const BlockEdge &BE = I->first;
const CFGBlock *Exit = BE.getDst();
+ if (Exit->empty())
+ continue;
const CFGElement &CE = Exit->front();
if (Optional<CFGStmt> CS = CE.getAs<CFGStmt>()) {
SmallString<128> bufI;
-// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,deadcode.DeadStores,debug.Stats -verify -Wno-unreachable-code -analyzer-opt-analyze-nested-blocks %s
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,deadcode.DeadStores,debug.Stats -verify -Wno-unreachable-code -analyzer-opt-analyze-nested-blocks -analyzer-max-loop 4 %s
int foo();
a /= 4;
return a;
}
+
+
+int sink() // expected-warning-re{{sink -> Total CFGBlocks: {{[0-9]+}} | Unreachable CFGBlocks: 1 | Exhausted Block: yes | Empty WorkList: yes}}
+{
+ for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) // expected-warning {{(sink): The analyzer generated a sink at this point}}
+ ++i;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int emptyConditionLoop() // expected-warning-re{{emptyConditionLoop -> Total CFGBlocks: {{[0-9]+}} | Unreachable CFGBlocks: 0 | Exhausted Block: yes | Empty WorkList: yes}}
+{
+ int num = 1;
+ for (;;)
+ num++;
+}