self.assertEqual(slice(None, None, -1).indices(10), (9, -1, -1))
self.assertEqual(slice(None, None, -2).indices(10), (9, -1, -2))
self.assertEqual(slice(3, None, -2).indices(10), (3, -1, -2))
+ # issue 3004 tests
+ self.assertEqual(slice(None, -9).indices(10), (0, 1, 1))
+ self.assertEqual(slice(None, -10).indices(10), (0, 0, 1))
+ self.assertEqual(slice(None, -11).indices(10), (0, 0, 1))
+ self.assertEqual(slice(None, -10, -1).indices(10), (9, 0, -1))
+ self.assertEqual(slice(None, -11, -1).indices(10), (9, -1, -1))
+ self.assertEqual(slice(None, -12, -1).indices(10), (9, -1, -1))
+ self.assertEqual(slice(None, 9).indices(10), (0, 9, 1))
+ self.assertEqual(slice(None, 10).indices(10), (0, 10, 1))
+ self.assertEqual(slice(None, 11).indices(10), (0, 10, 1))
+ self.assertEqual(slice(None, 8, -1).indices(10), (9, 8, -1))
+ self.assertEqual(slice(None, 9, -1).indices(10), (9, 9, -1))
+ self.assertEqual(slice(None, 10, -1).indices(10), (9, 9, -1))
+
self.assertEqual(
slice(-100, 100 ).indices(10),
slice(None).indices(10)
Core and Builtins
-----------------
+- Issue #3004: Minor change to slice.indices(): the start and stop
+ arguments are now treated identically, making the behaviour easier
+ to describe and understand. For example, slice(None, -10,
+ 1).indices(9) now returns (0, 0, 1) instead of (0, -1, 1), and
+ slice(None, 10, -1).indices(10) returns (9, 9, -1) instead of (9,
+ 10, -1).
+
- Make bin() implementation parallel oct() and hex().