def err_ovl_no_viable_oper : Error<"no viable overloaded '%0'">;
def err_ovl_deleted_oper : Error<
"overload resolution selected %select{unavailable|deleted}0 operator '%1'">;
+def err_ovl_no_viable_subscript :
+ Error<"no viable overloaded operator[] for type %0">;
+def err_ovl_no_oper :
+ Error<"type %0 does not provide a %select{subscript|call}1 operator">;
def err_ovl_no_viable_object_call : Error<
"no matching function for call to object of type %0">;
}
case OR_No_Viable_Function: {
- // No viable function; try to create a built-in operation, which will
- // produce an error. Then, show the non-viable candidates.
- OwningExprResult Result =
- CreateBuiltinArraySubscriptExpr(move(Base), LLoc, move(Idx), RLoc);
- assert(Result.isInvalid() &&
- "C++ subscript operator overloading is missing candidates!");
- if (Result.isInvalid())
- PrintOverloadCandidates(CandidateSet, /*OnlyViable=*/false,
- "[]", LLoc);
- return move(Result);
+ if (CandidateSet.empty())
+ Diag(LLoc, diag::err_ovl_no_oper)
+ << Args[0]->getType() << /*subscript*/ 0
+ << Args[0]->getSourceRange() << Args[1]->getSourceRange();
+ else
+ Diag(LLoc, diag::err_ovl_no_viable_subscript)
+ << Args[0]->getType()
+ << Args[0]->getSourceRange() << Args[1]->getSourceRange();
+ PrintOverloadCandidates(CandidateSet, /*OnlyViable=*/false,
+ "[]", LLoc);
+ return ExprError();
}
case OR_Ambiguous:
break;
case OR_No_Viable_Function:
- Diag(Object->getSourceRange().getBegin(),
- diag::err_ovl_no_viable_object_call)
- << Object->getType() << Object->getSourceRange();
+ if (CandidateSet.empty())
+ Diag(Object->getSourceRange().getBegin(), diag::err_ovl_no_oper)
+ << Object->getType() << /*call*/ 1
+ << Object->getSourceRange();
+ else
+ Diag(Object->getSourceRange().getBegin(),
+ diag::err_ovl_no_viable_object_call)
+ << Object->getType() << Object->getSourceRange();
PrintOverloadCandidates(CandidateSet, /*OnlyViable=*/false);
break;
a += x;
}
}
+
+// PR5900
+namespace pr5900 {
+ struct NotAnArray {};
+ void test0() {
+ NotAnArray x;
+ x[0] = 0; // expected-error {{does not provide a subscript operator}}
+ }
+
+ struct NonConstArray {
+ int operator[](unsigned); // expected-note {{candidate}}
+ };
+ int test1() {
+ const NonConstArray x;
+ return x[0]; // expected-error {{no viable overloaded operator[] for type}}
+ }
+
+ // Not really part of this PR, but implemented at the same time.
+ struct NotAFunction {};
+ void test2() {
+ NotAFunction x;
+ x(); // expected-error {{does not provide a call operator}}
+ }
+}