keep track of whether we need to zero-initialize storage prior to
calling its constructor. Previously, we were only tracking this when
implicitly constructing the object (a CXXConstructExpr).
Fixes Boost's value-initialization tests, which means that the
Boost.Config library now passes all of its tests.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@102461
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
CXXTemporaryObjectExpr(ASTContext &C, CXXConstructorDecl *Cons,
QualType writtenTy, SourceLocation tyBeginLoc,
Expr **Args,unsigned NumArgs,
- SourceLocation rParenLoc);
+ SourceLocation rParenLoc,
+ bool ZeroInitialization = false);
~CXXTemporaryObjectExpr() { }
SourceLocation tyBeginLoc,
Expr **Args,
unsigned NumArgs,
- SourceLocation rParenLoc)
+ SourceLocation rParenLoc,
+ bool ZeroInitialization)
: CXXConstructExpr(C, CXXTemporaryObjectExprClass, writtenTy, tyBeginLoc,
- Cons, false, Args, NumArgs),
+ Cons, false, Args, NumArgs, ZeroInitialization),
TyBeginLoc(tyBeginLoc), RParenLoc(rParenLoc) {
}
Kind.getLocation(),
Exprs,
NumExprs,
- Kind.getParenRange().getEnd()));
+ Kind.getParenRange().getEnd(),
+ ConstructorInitRequiresZeroInit));
} else
CurInit = S.BuildCXXConstructExpr(Loc, Entity.getType(),
Constructor,
C c = { 17 } ;
// CHECK: call void @_ZN1CD1Ev
}
+
+enum enum_type { negative_number = -1, magic_number = 42 };
+
+class enum_holder
+{
+ enum_type m_enum;
+
+public:
+ enum_holder() : m_enum(magic_number) { }
+};
+
+struct enum_holder_and_int
+{
+ enum_holder e;
+ int i;
+};
+
+// CHECK: _Z24test_enum_holder_and_intv()
+void test_enum_holder_and_int() {
+ // CHECK: alloca
+ // CHECK-NEXT: bitcast
+ // CHECK-NEXT: call void @llvm.memset
+ // CHECK-NEXT: call void @_ZN19enum_holder_and_intC1Ev
+ enum_holder_and_int();
+ // CHECK-NEXT: ret void
+}