[ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ]
- * mod_rate_limit: Fix error because of negative rate-limit
- PR 52964 [ianyin Xu <tixu cs ucsd edu>]
- trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1439623
- 2.4.x patch: trunk patch applies.
- +1: jailletc36, fuankg, jim
-
* Set of easy patches to keep 2.4.x in line with trunk
1442865: Change bzero/bcopy into memset/memcpy (PR 54346)
1442759: Can't figure out why we allocate len+2 bytes here. Len+1 should be enough.
if (ctx == NULL) {
const char *rl = NULL;
+ int ratelimit;
/* no subrequests. */
if (f->r->main != NULL) {
ap_remove_output_filter(f);
return ap_pass_brigade(f->next, bb);
}
-
- /* first run, init stuff */
- ctx = apr_palloc(f->r->pool, sizeof(rl_ctx_t));
- f->ctx = ctx;
- ctx->speed = 0;
- ctx->state = RATE_LIMIT;
-
+
/* rl is in kilo bytes / second */
- ctx->speed = atoi(rl) * 1024;
-
- if (ctx->speed == 0) {
+ ratelimit = atoi(rl) * 1024;
+ if (ratelimit <= 0) {
/* remove ourselves */
ap_remove_output_filter(f);
return ap_pass_brigade(f->next, bb);
}
+ /* first run, init stuff */
+ ctx = apr_palloc(f->r->pool, sizeof(rl_ctx_t));
+ f->ctx = ctx;
+ ctx->state = RATE_LIMIT;
+ ctx->speed = ratelimit;
+
/* calculate how many bytes / interval we want to send */
/* speed is bytes / second, so, how many (speed / 1000 % interval) */
ctx->chunk_size = (ctx->speed / (1000 / RATE_INTERVAL_MS));