Fix some minor documentation issues

Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>

diff --git a/doc/crypto/d2i_ECPrivateKey.pod b/doc/crypto/d2i_ECPrivateKey.pod
index 928c6fb78c3fe897757ffee3924402660d293dde..adeffe643c849ad2b108e6b004eae0ecfe2f5915 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/crypto/d2i_ECPrivateKey.pod
+++ b/doc/crypto/d2i_ECPrivateKey.pod
@@ -31,8 +31,8 @@ for a description of point_conversion_form.
 When reading a private key encoded without an associated public key (e.g. if
 EC_PKEY_NO_PUBKEY has been used - see below), then d2i_ECPrivateKey generates
 the missing public key automatically. Private keys encoded without parameters
-(e.g. if EC_PKEY_NO_PARAMETERS has been used - see below) then the key cannot be
-loaded using d2i_ECPrivateKey.
+(e.g. if EC_PKEY_NO_PARAMETERS has been used - see below) cannot be loaded using
+d2i_ECPrivateKey.
 
 The functions EC_KEY_get_enc_flags and EC_KEY_set_enc_flags get and set the
 value of the encoding flags for the B<key>. There are two encoding flags

diff --git a/doc/crypto/d2i_X509.pod b/doc/crypto/d2i_X509.pod
index 65392427e7ea171724bdba7144586e8889dbcad7..e3dc2381966b2359658eabbf9b626d503cb07c87 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/crypto/d2i_X509.pod
+++ b/doc/crypto/d2i_X509.pod
@@ -82,8 +82,7 @@ can trap the unwary. See the B<WARNINGS> section for some common
 errors.
 
 The reason for the auto increment behaviour is to reflect a typical
-usage of ASN1 functions: after one structure is encoded or decoded    if (a != NULL)
-        (*a) = ret;
+usage of ASN1 functions: after one structure is encoded or decoded
 another will processed after it.
 
 =head1 EXAMPLES
@@ -205,8 +204,7 @@ of this "reuse" behaviour is strongly discouraged.
 
 i2d_X509() will not return an error in many versions of OpenSSL,
 if mandatory fields are not initialized due to a programming error
-then the encoded structure may contain invalid data or omit the    if (a != NULL)
-        (*a) = ret;
+then the encoded structure may contain invalid data or omit the
 fields entirely and will not be parsed by d2i_X509(). This may be
 fixed in future so code should not assume that i2d_X509() will
 always succeed.