Fix inconsistency in comments atop ExecParallelEstimate.

When this code was initially introduced in commit d1b7c1ff, the structure
used was SharedPlanStateInstrumentation, but later when it got changed to
Instrumentation structure in commit b287df70, we forgot to update the
comment.

Reported-by: Wu Fei
Author: Wu Fei
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/52E6E0843B9D774C8C73D6CF64402F0562215EB2@G08CNEXMBPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local

diff --git a/src/backend/executor/execParallel.c b/src/backend/executor/execParallel.c
index 0ac12ef26bc11c42b735f342f7750efc91451b30..87826d0a9840aefc06b97501eba0b90b928815a0 100644 (file)
--- a/src/backend/executor/execParallel.c
+++ b/src/backend/executor/execParallel.c
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ ExecSerializePlan(Plan *plan, EState *estate)
  * &pcxt->estimator.
  *
  * While we're at it, count the number of PlanState nodes in the tree, so
- * we know how many SharedPlanStateInstrumentation structures we need.
+ * we know how many Instrumentation structures we need.
  */
 static bool
 ExecParallelEstimate(PlanState *planstate, ExecParallelEstimateContext *e)