// types, e.g.,
// typedef typename T::type T1;
// typedef typename T1::type T2;
- if (const DependentNameType *DNT = T->getAs<DependentNameType>()) {
- NestedNameSpecifier *Prefix
- = getCanonicalNestedNameSpecifier(DNT->getQualifier());
- return NestedNameSpecifier::Create(*this, Prefix,
+ if (const DependentNameType *DNT = T->getAs<DependentNameType>())
+ return NestedNameSpecifier::Create(*this, DNT->getQualifier(),
const_cast<IdentifierInfo *>(DNT->getIdentifier()));
- }
- // Do the same thing as above, but with dependent-named specializations.
- if (const DependentTemplateSpecializationType *DTST
- = T->getAs<DependentTemplateSpecializationType>()) {
- NestedNameSpecifier *Prefix
- = getCanonicalNestedNameSpecifier(DTST->getQualifier());
-
- T = getDependentTemplateSpecializationType(DTST->getKeyword(),
- Prefix, DTST->getIdentifier(),
- DTST->getNumArgs(),
- DTST->getArgs());
- T = getCanonicalType(T);
- }
-
+ // Otherwise, just canonicalize the type, and force it to be a TypeSpec.
+ // FIXME: Why are TypeSpec and TypeSpecWithTemplate distinct in the
+ // first place?
return NestedNameSpecifier::Create(*this, 0, false,
const_cast<Type*>(T.getTypePtr()));
}