<!--
-$PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ref/drop_operator.sgml,v 1.23 2003/11/29 19:51:38 pgsql Exp $
+$PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ref/drop_operator.sgml,v 1.24 2003/12/02 00:26:59 tgl Exp $
PostgreSQL documentation
-->
<para>
Remove the right unary factorial operator <literal>x!</literal>
- for type <type>integer</type>:
+ for type <type>bigint</type>:
<programlisting>
-DROP OPERATOR ! (integer, none);
+DROP OPERATOR ! (bigint, none);
</programlisting>
</para>
</refsect1>
<!--
-$PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/typeconv.sgml,v 1.40 2003/12/01 21:53:15 momjian Exp $
+$PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/typeconv.sgml,v 1.41 2003/12/02 00:26:59 tgl Exp $
-->
<chapter Id="typeconv">
</example>
<example>
-<title>Absolute-Value and Factorial Operator Type Resolution</title>
+<title>Absolute-Value and Negation Operator Type Resolution</title>
<para>
The <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> operator catalog has several
ERROR: "-4.5e500" is out of range for type double precision
</screen>
</para>
+
+<para>
+On the other hand, the prefix operator <literal>~</> (bitwise negation)
+is defined only for integer data types, not for <type>float8</type>. So, if we
+try a similar case with <literal>~</>, we get:
+<screen>
+SELECT ~ '20' AS "negation";
+
+ERROR: operator is not unique: ~ "unknown"
+HINT: Could not choose a best candidate operator. You may need to add explicit
+type casts.
+</screen>
+This happens because the system can't decide which of the several
+possible <literal>~</> operators should be preferred. We can help
+it out with an explicit cast:
+<screen>
+SELECT ~ CAST('20' AS int8) AS "negation";
+
+ negation
+----------
+ -21
+(1 row)
+</screen>
+</para>
</example>
</sect1>
* Copyright (c) 1998-2003, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
*
* IDENTIFICATION
- * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c,v 1.69 2003/12/01 21:52:37 momjian Exp $
+ * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c,v 1.70 2003/12/02 00:26:59 tgl Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
/*
* numeric_fac()
- * Computer factorial
+ *
+ * Compute factorial
*/
-
Datum
numeric_fac(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
-
int64 num = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
- NumericVar count;
+ Numeric res;
NumericVar fact;
- NumericVar zerovar;
NumericVar result;
- Numeric res;
- if(num < 1) {
+ if (num <= 1)
+ {
res = make_result(&const_one);
PG_RETURN_NUMERIC(res);
}
-
init_var(&fact);
- init_var(&count);
init_var(&result);
- init_var(&zerovar);
- zero_var(&zerovar);
-
- int8_to_numericvar((int64)num, &result);
- set_var_from_var(&const_one, &count);
- for(num = num - 1; num > 0; num--) {
- set_var_from_var(&result,&count);
+ int8_to_numericvar(num, &result);
- int8_to_numericvar((int64)num,&fact);
+ for (num = num - 1; num > 1; num--)
+ {
+ int8_to_numericvar(num, &fact);
- mul_var(&count, &fact, &result, count.dscale + fact.dscale);
+ mul_var(&result, &fact, &result, 0);
}
- res = make_result(&count);
+ res = make_result(&result);
- free_var(&count);
free_var(&fact);
free_var(&result);
- free_var(&zerovar);
PG_RETURN_NUMERIC(res);
}