</para>
<para>
- If this is on, you should create users as <literal>username@dbname</>.
- When <literal>username</> is passed by a connecting client,
+ If this is on, you should create users as <replaceable>username@dbname</>.
+ When <replaceable>username</> is passed by a connecting client,
<literal>@</> and the database name are appended to the user
name and that database-specific user name is looked up by the
server. Note that when you create users with names containing
<entry>No</entry>
<entry>
multiple continuous percentile: returns an array of results matching
- the shape of the <literal>fractions</literal> parameter, with each
+ the shape of the <replaceable>fractions</replaceable> parameter, with each
non-null element replaced by the value corresponding to that percentile
</entry>
</row>
<entry>No</entry>
<entry>
multiple discrete percentile: returns an array of results matching the
- shape of the <literal>fractions</literal> parameter, with each non-null
+ shape of the <replaceable>fractions</replaceable> parameter, with each non-null
element replaced by the input value corresponding to that percentile
</entry>
</row>
<para>
<function>pg_options_to_table</function> returns the set of storage
option name/value pairs
- (<literal>option_name</>/<literal>option_value</>) when passed
+ (<replaceable>option_name</>/<replaceable>option_value</>) when passed
<structname>pg_class</>.<structfield>reloptions</> or
<structname>pg_attribute</>.<structfield>attoptions</>.
</para>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
- The standard's <literal>AS <data type></literal> expression is not
+ The standard's <literal>AS <replaceable>data_type</></literal> expression is not
supported.
</para>
</listitem>
<para>
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname>
- allows identifier syntax (<literal>"rolename"</literal>), while
+ allows identifier syntax (<literal>"<replaceable>rolename</>"</literal>), while
the SQL standard requires the role name to be written as a string
literal. SQL does not allow this command during a transaction;
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname> does not make this
The SQL standard allows some other expressions to appear in place
of the literal <replaceable>user_name</replaceable>, but these options
are not important in practice. <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>
- allows identifier syntax (<literal>"username"</literal>), which SQL
+ allows identifier syntax (<literal>"<replaceable>username</>"</literal>), which SQL
does not. SQL does not allow this command during a transaction;
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname> does not make this
restriction because there is no reason to.
</para>
<para>
- The optional parameter <literal>PATTERN</literal> can be the name of
+ The optional parameter <replaceable>PATTERN</replaceable> can be the name of
a text search object, optionally schema-qualified. If
- <literal>PATTERN</literal> is omitted then information about all
- visible objects will be displayed. <literal>PATTERN</literal> can be a
+ <replaceable>PATTERN</replaceable> is omitted then information about all
+ visible objects will be displayed. <replaceable>PATTERN</replaceable> can be a
regular expression and can provide <emphasis>separate</emphasis> patterns
for the schema and object names. The following examples illustrate this:
<para>
If an argument is of a composite type, then the dot notation,
- e.g., <literal>argname.fieldname</literal> or
- <literal>$1.fieldname</literal>, can be used to access attributes of the
+ e.g., <literal><replaceable>argname</>.<replaceable>fieldname</></literal> or
+ <literal>$1.<replaceable>fieldname</></literal>, can be used to access attributes of the
argument. Again, you might need to qualify the argument's name with the
function name to make the form with an argument name unambiguous.
</para>
Another option is to use
functional notation for extracting an attribute. The simple way
to explain this is that we can use the
- notations <literal>attribute(table)</> and <literal>table.attribute</>
+ notations <literal><replaceable>attribute</>(<replaceable>table</>)</>
+ and <literal><replaceable>table</>.<replaceable>attribute</></>
interchangeably.
<screen>
<para>
A function that takes a single argument of a composite type should
generally not have the same name as any attribute (field) of that type.
- Recall that <literal>attribute(table)</literal> is considered equivalent
- to <literal>table.attribute</literal>. In the case that there is an
+ Recall that <literal><replaceable>attribute</>(<replaceable>table</>)</literal>
+ is considered equivalent
+ to <literal><replaceable>table</>.<replaceable>attribute</></literal>.
+ In the case that there is an
ambiguity between a function on a composite type and an attribute of
the composite type, the attribute will always be used. It is possible
to override that choice by schema-qualifying the function name
- (that is, <literal>schema.func(table)</literal>) but it's better to
+ (that is, <literal><replaceable>schema</>.<replaceable>func</>(<replaceable>table</>)
+ </literal>) but it's better to
avoid the problem by not choosing conflicting names.
</para>
HeapTuple BuildTupleFromCStrings(AttInMetadata *attinmeta, char **values)
</programlisting>
to build a <structname>HeapTuple</> given user data
- in C string form. <literal>values</literal> is an array of C strings,
+ in C string form. <parameter>values</parameter> is an array of C strings,
one for each attribute of the return row. Each C string should be in
the form expected by the input function of the attribute data
type. In order to return a null value for one of the attributes,