if (!LiveLoopBlocks.count(From))
return false;
BasicBlock *TheOnlySucc = getOnlyLiveSuccessor(From);
- return !TheOnlySucc || TheOnlySucc == To;
+ return !TheOnlySucc || TheOnlySucc == To || LI.getLoopFor(From) != &L;
};
// The loop will not be destroyed if its latch is live.
; RUN: opt -S -enable-loop-simplifycfg-term-folding=true -passes='require<domtree>,loop(indvars,simplify-cfg)' -debug-only=loop-simplifycfg -verify-loop-info -verify-dom-info -verify-loop-lcssa 2>&1 < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -S -enable-loop-simplifycfg-term-folding=true -indvars -loop-simplifycfg -enable-mssa-loop-dependency=true -verify-memoryssa -debug-only=loop-simplifycfg -verify-loop-info -verify-dom-info -verify-loop-lcssa 2>&1 < %s | FileCheck %s
-; This test demonstrates a bug in live blocks markup that is only catchable in
-; inter-pass interaction.
define void @test(i1 %c) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test(
; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT: switch i32 0, label [[ENTRY_SPLIT:%.*]] [
+; CHECK-NEXT: i32 1, label [[DEAD_EXIT:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: ]
+; CHECK: entry-split:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[OUTER:%.*]]
; CHECK: outer:
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[C:%.*]], label [[TO_FOLD:%.*]], label [[LATCH:%.*]]
; CHECK: latch.loopexit:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[LATCH]]
; CHECK: latch:
-; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 true, label [[OUTER]], label [[DEAD_EXIT:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[OUTER]]
; CHECK: dead_exit:
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
;