// expected-error@+1 {{uuid attribute contains a malformed GUID}}
[uuid(0Z0000A0-0000-0000-C000-000000000049)] struct struct_with_uuid2;
+struct OuterClass {
+ // [] uuids and inner classes are weird in cl.exe: It warns that uuid on
+ // nested types has undefined behavior, and errors out __uuidof() claiming
+ // that the inner type has no assigned uuid. Things work fine if __declspec()
+ // is used instead. clang-cl handles this fine.
+ [uuid(10000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)] class InnerClass1;
+ [uuid(10000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)] class InnerClass2 {} ic;
+ [uuid(10000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)] static class InnerClass3 {} sic;
+ // Putting `static` in front of [...] causes parse errors in both cl and clang
+
+ // This is the only syntax to declare an inner class with []-style attributes
+ // that works in cl: Declare the inner class without an attribute, and then
+ // have the []-style attribute on the definition.
+ class InnerClass;
+};
+[uuid(10000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)] class OuterClass::InnerClass {};
+
void use_it() {
(void)__uuidof(struct_with_uuid);
(void)__uuidof(struct_with_uuid_brace);
(void)__uuidof(struct_with_uuid2_macro);
(void)__uuidof(struct_with_uuid2_macro_part);
(void)__uuidof(struct_with_uuid2_trigraph);
+
+ (void)__uuidof(OuterClass::InnerClass);
+ (void)__uuidof(OuterClass::InnerClass1);
+ (void)__uuidof(OuterClass::InnerClass2);
+ (void)__uuidof(OuterClass::InnerClass3);
+ (void)__uuidof(OuterClass().ic);
+ (void)__uuidof(OuterClass::sic);
}
+
+// expected-warning@+1 {{'uuid' attribute only applies to classes}}
+[uuid("000000A0-0000-0000-C000-000000000049")] void f();
}
// clang supports these on toplevel decls, but not on local decls since this