return Size == 32 || Size == 64;
}
+static bool addFieldSizes(ASTContext &Context, const RecordDecl *RD,
+ uint64_t &Size) {
+ for (const auto *FD : RD->fields()) {
+ // Scalar arguments on the stack get 4 byte alignment on x86. If the
+ // argument is smaller than 32-bits, expanding the struct will create
+ // alignment padding.
+ if (!is32Or64BitBasicType(FD->getType(), Context))
+ return false;
+
+ // FIXME: Reject bit-fields wholesale; there are two problems, we don't know
+ // how to expand them yet, and the predicate for telling if a bitfield still
+ // counts as "basic" is more complicated than what we were doing previously.
+ if (FD->isBitField())
+ return false;
+
+ Size += Context.getTypeSize(FD->getType());
+ }
+ return true;
+}
+
+static bool addBaseAndFieldSizes(ASTContext &Context, const CXXRecordDecl *RD,
+ uint64_t &Size) {
+ // Don't do this if there are any non-empty bases.
+ for (const CXXBaseSpecifier &Base : RD->bases()) {
+ if (!addBaseAndFieldSizes(Context, Base.getType()->getAsCXXRecordDecl(),
+ Size))
+ return false;
+ }
+ if (!addFieldSizes(Context, RD, Size))
+ return false;
+ return true;
+}
+
/// Test whether an argument type which is to be passed indirectly (on the
/// stack) would have the equivalent layout if it was expanded into separate
/// arguments. If so, we prefer to do the latter to avoid inhibiting
if (!RT)
return false;
const RecordDecl *RD = RT->getDecl();
+ uint64_t Size = 0;
if (const CXXRecordDecl *CXXRD = dyn_cast<CXXRecordDecl>(RD)) {
- if (!IsWin32StructABI ) {
+ if (!IsWin32StructABI) {
// On non-Windows, we have to conservatively match our old bitcode
// prototypes in order to be ABI-compatible at the bitcode level.
if (!CXXRD->isCLike())
// Don't do this for dynamic classes.
if (CXXRD->isDynamicClass())
return false;
- // Don't do this if there are any non-empty bases.
- for (const CXXBaseSpecifier &Base : CXXRD->bases()) {
- if (!isEmptyRecord(getContext(), Base.getType(), /*AllowArrays=*/true))
- return false;
- }
}
- }
-
- uint64_t Size = 0;
-
- for (const auto *FD : RD->fields()) {
- // Scalar arguments on the stack get 4 byte alignment on x86. If the
- // argument is smaller than 32-bits, expanding the struct will create
- // alignment padding.
- if (!is32Or64BitBasicType(FD->getType(), getContext()))
+ if (!addBaseAndFieldSizes(getContext(), CXXRD, Size))
return false;
-
- // FIXME: Reject bit-fields wholesale; there are two problems, we don't know
- // how to expand them yet, and the predicate for telling if a bitfield still
- // counts as "basic" is more complicated than what we were doing previously.
- if (FD->isBitField())
+ } else {
+ if (!addFieldSizes(getContext(), RD, Size))
return false;
-
- Size += getContext().getTypeSize(FD->getType());
}
// We can do this if there was no alignment padding.
int a, b, c, d, e, f;
};
+struct BaseNoByval : Small {
+ int bb;
+};
+
// WIN32: declare void @"{{.*take_bools_and_chars.*}}"
// WIN32: (<{ i8, [3 x i8], i8, [3 x i8], %struct.SmallWithDtor,
// WIN32: i8, [3 x i8], i8, [3 x i8], i32, i8, [3 x i8] }>* inalloca)
// WIN64: define void @"\01?medium_arg@@YAXUMedium@@@Z"(i64 %s.coerce)
// WOA: define arm_aapcs_vfpcc void @"\01?medium_arg@@YAXUMedium@@@Z"([2 x i32] %s.coerce)
+void base_no_byval_arg(BaseNoByval s) {}
+// LINUX-LABEL: define void @_Z17base_no_byval_arg11BaseNoByval(%struct.BaseNoByval* byval align 4 %s)
+// WIN32: define void @"\01?base_no_byval_arg@@YAXUBaseNoByval@@@Z"(i32 %s.0, i32 %s.1)
+// WIN64: define void @"\01?base_no_byval_arg@@YAXUBaseNoByval@@@Z"(i64 %s.coerce)
+// WOA: define arm_aapcs_vfpcc void @"\01?base_no_byval_arg@@YAXUBaseNoByval@@@Z"([2 x i32] %s.coerce)
+
void small_arg_with_ctor(SmallWithCtor s) {}
// LINUX-LABEL: define void @_Z19small_arg_with_ctor13SmallWithCtor(%struct.SmallWithCtor* byval align 4 %s)
// WIN32: define void @"\01?small_arg_with_ctor@@YAXUSmallWithCtor@@@Z"(i32 %s.0)