add a con of clang vs gcc

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@44882 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/www/comparison.html b/www/comparison.html
index 0c734914626c400b161c7f0d2abdfd02141338c0..2c979b96e9e1df610314c069ca3007cf07efc8ea 100644 (file)
--- a/www/comparison.html
+++ b/www/comparison.html
@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@
     <li>GCC front-ends are very mature and already support C/C++/ObjC and all\r
         the variants we are interested in.  clang's support for C++ in\r
         particular is nowhere near what GCC supports.</li>\r
+    <li>GCC's codegen is much more mature than clang's right now.  clang is\r
+        only capable of codegen for small and simple projects and does not yet\r
+        support debug info.</li>\r
     <li>GCC is popular and widely adopted.</li>\r
     <li>GCC does not require a C++ compiler to build it.</li>\r
     </ul>\r