[LangRef] Drop misleading anecdote

`shl nsw i8 1, i8 8` is poison, but `mul i8 1, i8 128` is not.

This was discussed previously here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-April/084195.html.  From
the discussion, it was not clear which semantics we want for `shl`, but
for now at least make the language reference more accurate.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@286785 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/docs/LangRef.rst b/docs/LangRef.rst
index f20f4385c2fe785a9e1bf21532e92e5ae327d050..c5f927d92efdf5a85877e7620e09583a3054028e 100644 (file)
--- a/docs/LangRef.rst
+++ b/docs/LangRef.rst
@@ -6430,9 +6430,7 @@ If the ``nuw`` keyword is present, then the shift produces a :ref:`poison
 value <poisonvalues>` if it shifts out any non-zero bits. If the
 ``nsw`` keyword is present, then the shift produces a :ref:`poison
 value <poisonvalues>` if it shifts out any bits that disagree with the
-resultant sign bit. As such, NUW/NSW have the same semantics as they
-would if the shift were expressed as a mul instruction with the same
-nsw/nuw bits in (mul %op1, (shl 1, %op2)).
+resultant sign bit.
 
 Example:
 """"""""