When testing whether a sub-plan can do projection, use a general-purpose

When testing whether a sub-plan can do projection, use a general-purpose
check instead of hardwiring assumptions that only certain plan node types
can appear at the places where we are testing.  This was always a pretty
fragile assumption, and it turns out to be broken in 7.4 for certain cases
involving IN-subselect tests that need type coercion.
Also, modify code that builds finished Plan tree so that node types that
don't do projection always copy their input node's targetlist, rather than
having the tlist passed in from the caller.  The old method makes it too
easy to write broken code that thinks it can modify the tlist when it
cannot.