I'm pretty sure that some pre-standard compilers don't know how to
apply an initializer to a variable of type union. Unfortunately, I don't
have access to one to check. Fortunately, there's no need to explicitly
initialize `zeroany' since the default value is what we want--the first
field will be set to zero or null as appropriate (null in this case).
Strictly speaking, this isn't adequate; what if long is wider than a
pointer rather than narrower? Using `= {DUMMY}' didn't handle that case
either; the ordering of the union's fields controls which bits get stored.
As a practical matter, it should make no difference. As long as the code
reading a union accesses the same field as the code writing that union set
up in it, anything in extraneous bits should be irrelevant--except perhaps
when a debugger tries to format things. The whole issue has always been
implicitly based on the assumption that null pointers have all bits zero
in the first place; that's typical but not guaranteed.